Electromagnetic lens for an SEM

AI Thread Summary
Machining tolerances in the construction of electromagnetic lenses for scanning electron microscopes (SEM) generally have minimal impact on resolution, provided the lenses are not poorly constructed. Regular alignment of the SEM is crucial, as it can compensate for minor manufacturing defects. The machining of apertures in the final condensing lens is more critical, with very tight tolerances that significantly affect resolution. If image resolution issues arise, other factors should be investigated before considering lens machining tolerances. For further understanding of SEM construction and operation, relevant literature can provide deeper insights.
reduction
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how the machining tolerance in the construction of an electromagnetic lens affects resolution in a scanning electron microscope?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you be a bit more specific with respect to what tolerances you are referring to?

In general, as long as it wasn't made by Joe Bloggs out of bits from his garden shed, SEM lens construction tolerances don't have much affect on resolution. Good practice in an EM unit would be to align the microscope on a weekly basis. Proper alignment can overcome small manufacturing defects in the lenses. In a properly aligned machine, of greater importance is the machining of the apertures in the final condensing lens. Tolerances here are very small, and can effect resolution greatly.

If you are having problems with image resolution, I would look in 100 other places before I started worrying about machining tolerances in the lenses.

[Source: BSc(Hons) Physics, MMedSc Electron Microscopy]
 
euni1968 said:
Can you be a bit more specific with respect to what tolerances you are referring to?

In general, as long as it wasn't made by Joe Bloggs out of bits from his garden shed, SEM lens construction tolerances don't have much affect on resolution. Good practice in an EM unit would be to align the microscope on a weekly basis. Proper alignment can overcome small manufacturing defects in the lenses. In a properly aligned machine, of greater importance is the machining of the apertures in the final condensing lens. Tolerances here are very small, and can effect resolution greatly.

If you are having problems with image resolution, I would look in 100 other places before I started worrying about machining tolerances in the lenses.

[Source: BSc(Hons) Physics, MMedSc Electron Microscopy]

Many thanks for your reply. I'm not actually troubleshooting an SEM but merely curious about their construction and operation. I'd be very appreciative if you could point me towards any literature on those topics.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top