Electromagnetic Waves Problem -

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field amplitude of a 200 MW laser pulse focused to a diameter of 2.0 micrometers, with the correct value determined as 2.19×10^11 V/m. For Part B, the user struggles to find the ratio of this electric field to that of the electric field binding an electron to a proton in a hydrogen atom, initially using an incorrect method. A suggestion is made to apply the standard electric field equation for a point charge, E=q/(4πε₀r²), to simplify the calculation. This approach is recommended as it directly relates to the electric field generated by the proton at the radius of the electron's orbit. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct formula for accurate results in electromagnetic wave problems.
ashkash
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A 200 MW laser pulse is focused with a lens to a diameter of 2.0 micrometers.

Part A:
What is the laser beam's electric field amplitude at the focal point?

Part B:
What is the ratio of this electric field to the electric field that keeps the electron bound to the proton of a hydrogen atom? The radius of the electron's orbit is 0.053 nm.


I was able to get Part A correct. I used I = P/A to find the intensity using the power and area and then used E = sqrt( (2* I) / (c * epsilon_0)) to find the amplitude of the electric field and I got a numerical value of 2.19×10^11 V/m.

Part B is where I need help. I tried finding the electric field like I did in part A using the new radius given (0.053 nm) and then divided my answer from part A by this to get the ratio, but this does not work. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got the hard part! Part B is much simpler. Use the standard electric field equation for a point charge: E=q/(4pi epsilon r^2)
 
thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top