Electromagnetism Homework Help: Gauss & Coulomb Laws for Flux Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the flux of the electrostatic field through a sphere centered at the origin with given charges, start by applying Gauss's law, which relates the electric flux to the enclosed charge. The total charge can be summed up and then divided by the permittivity of free space (epsilon0) to find the flux. The analogy of flux lines as flowing water helps conceptualize the problem, where the charges act as sources. Some participants noted that this approach seems simpler than previous exercises, indicating a potential discrepancy in difficulty. Understanding the superposition principle is key to solving the problem effectively.
Kyho
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, got some homework to do in electromagnetism and one of the problems is:

Homework Statement



Consider a Cartesian coordinate system with charges Q (Q = 15μC) at x = + and – 1.3cm, and at y = + 1.7cm and
– 0.7cm and at z = + 2cm and -0.5cm. Calculate the flux of the electrostatic field through the surface of a sphere
of radius 3cm, centered at the origin.

Equations:
Gauss law. Coulomb law

Attempts:
I don't really know the right way to start this problem. The only thing I done is placed the charges in a cartesian coordinate system. I thought of calculating all the electric fields to get the resultant electric field. and from there on I have no idea how to continue.

Not asking here for a complete solution of the problem, but maybe a hint on how to start.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
think of the flux lines as flowing water. the charges are sources of water. calculate the total amount of water leaving the sphere.
 
well after consulting with some friends, they came to the result that you just got to add up the charges and the divide it through epsilon0. (thanks to: superpostion principle)

seems a bit to simplictic for an uni exercise sheet as the one from last week was way harder :/.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top