Electromagnetism: Trouble understanding the D field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the electric displacement field (D) in electromagnetism, particularly its application in finding the electric field (E) within dielectrics and cavities. The electric displacement field is directly proportional to the surface charge distribution, allowing for the calculation of E when the surface charge is known. It is effective in scenarios like parallel plate capacitors with dielectrics in series, but not in configurations where the surface charge distribution changes, such as dielectrics in parallel. The conversation also touches on the relationship between surface charge density and bound charge in dielectrics, emphasizing the importance of knowing the charge distribution for accurate calculations. Overall, clarity on these concepts is essential for solving related exam questions effectively.
BeBattey
Messages
59
Reaction score
6
I've just finished my first term in an undergrad electromagnetism course using Wangsness as a textbook and we ended on the displacement field.

I feel like Wangsness doesn't give a very good explanation of what the whole point of it actually is, and I still don't quite understand how to use it to find the e field inside both a dielectric and a cavity within a dielectric.

If I could get a quick and easy explanation or a point in the right direction I'd greatly appreciate it, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi BeBattey! :smile:

The electric displacement field (D, measured in coulombs per square metre) is helpful if you know the surface charge distribution (because it's proportional to it).

So if you know the surface charge distribution, that gives you D, and you can immediately find E for different dielectric fillings, provided inserting the dielectric does not alter the surface charge distribution.

So it works eg for a parallel plate capacitor with dielectrics in series (and with edges parallel to the plates), but not for dielectrics in parallel (because the surface charge distribution will change).
 
Thanks for the response!

So the surface charge density you're talking about, is that the bound charge mentioned in the textbook? I know the bound surface charge is P dot n-hat, given the polarization of a dielectric, is this what you mean about the proportionality?
 
Hi BeBattey! :smile:

I was really thinking about those exam questions where you know the surface charge, either because the question specifically tells you, or because eg it's a sphere and you can use gauss, or it's a capacitor and you know C V and A (area), so you can find σ = Q/A (and D = σñ).
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top