Electromagnets and Conductors: The Effects on a Pendulum

  • Thread starter Thread starter XigmaTek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnets
AI Thread Summary
When a magnet pendulum is affected by a nearby electrical conductor, Lenz's Law indicates that eddy currents will form in the conductor, opposing the magnet's motion. This interaction causes the pendulum to slow down more rapidly, resulting in a quicker decrease in amplitude. The period of the pendulum remains largely unchanged, particularly at small angles, despite the reduction in amplitude. To measure the amplitude, one can capture a time-exposure image to determine the maximum deflection. The orientation of the magnet's poles does not affect the outcome, as both poles produce similar effects.
XigmaTek
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Question:
Describe what will happen when a magnet suspended in the form of a pendulum is affected by an electrical conductor in close proximity.

My working:
Lenz's Law states that the emf induced in a conductor will oppose the emf of the change that produced it. Let's say I designed my experiment this way...

[PLAIN]http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/562/assessment.png
the dotted line represents the trajectory of the pendulum (should be a perfect parabola shape..)

The magnet moving over the sheet of metal will produce eddy currents in the metal, which will oppose the magnetic field caused by the magnet. Thus, this will cause the pendulum to slow down faster and its period and amplitude will decrease much quicker than if there was no conductor.

Am I correct? What else can be said about this situation? Is there a changing magnetic field present here?
Thank youuuuu!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you said about the EM is basically correct, but a couple of comments:

(1) Pendulums move on a circular path, not a parabola.

(2) The period of a pendulum is pretty much independent of the amplitude. The amplitude will decrease, but the period will not change.
 
thanks for that info. but your second point would apply only to small angles.
how would i go about measuring the amplitude?
also, does it matter which end of the magnet (N or S) is facing the sheet of metal as it moves over it?
 
XigmaTek said:
thanks for that info. but your second point would apply only to small angles.
how would i go about measuring the amplitude?
also, does it matter which end of the magnet (N or S) is facing the sheet of metal as it moves over it?
-You are correct, the period is only independent of amplitude only for small angles.
-To measure the amplitude, you need to measure the maximum deflection. You could take a time exposure picture or a movie and measure it off the picture.
-It doesn't matter whether it is the N or S pole, the effect is the same.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Back
Top