Electron Configuration - Notation Clarification

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies confusion about electron orbitals, specifically regarding the s, p, d, and f subshells. The 2s shell is a separate, orthogonal orbital that does not overlap with the 1s orbital, meaning they exist independently rather than adding to one another. Illustrations in the Periodic Table depict the total number of electrons in a shell, which can lead to misunderstandings about their arrangement. The initial two electrons in the 1s orbital are distinct from the additional electrons in the 2s and 2p orbitals. Understanding that these orbitals are labels for wavefunctions rather than direct geometric representations is crucial for accurate interpretation.
ract
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Warm greetings,

My confusion surronds Electron-orbitals...

My text describes the sub-shells s, p, d, and f. If s shell has 2 electrons in spherical orbit, and p shell 6 electrons in 3 lobed orbitals, where on Earth are the other 2 electrons that complete the orbital shell of Neon? What is the '2s' shell? And why do all illustrations of the elements in the Periodic Table show 2 initial electrons surrounded by 8, that's eight, electrons in one shell!?

Thanks in advance for your clarification.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2s is also "spherical" (isotropic). just as 1s (and every other s orbital).

The illustrations are referring to the number of electrons that share the same principal quantum number n (2 for n=1 etc)
 
Thanks

Is the 2s a sperical orbit overlayed/ontop of the initial 1s spherical orbit, or does it somehow add to a 1s orbit leading to a larger sphere?
 
Can anyone point me in the direction of an article that might answer my query, and provide evidence for this structure?

Thanks
 
ract said:
Thanks

Is the 2s a sperical orbit overlayed/ontop of the initial 1s spherical orbit, or does it somehow add to a 1s orbit leading to a larger sphere?

No, the 1s and 2s orbitals are orthogonal; i.e. they do not overlap.

It is worth keeping in mind here that 1s, 2s etc are "labels" for wavefunctions (and often depicted in k-space) . You have to be VERY careful when interpreting them geometrically in real space (s is isotropic and p polar, everything else is just very complicated).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top