Electron Configuration of Filled Valence Electron Orbitals

Dong Aleta
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I have understood how elements such as Be and Ca, with fully filled 2s orbitals, are not to be considered "noble" because they still have unfilled p orbitals. But I'm having trouble understanding how these elements participate in chemical reactions without having any unpaired electrons.

My understanding is that for an atom to bond (ionically or covalently) it has to have an unpaired electron. Is that incorrect? If yes, can you please explain how? Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energetic difference between s and p orbitals is quite low in these elements so that the energy required to promote an s electron to a p orbital before bonding is made up by the energy gained in bonding.
 
DrDu said:
The energetic difference between s and p orbitals is quite low in these elements so that the energy required to promote an s electron to a p orbital before bonding is made up by the energy gained in bonding.
Does that mean that elements such as Be and Ca have a different mechanism for forming bonds, different than those of, say Na with an unpaired 3s1 electron and Cl with another unpaired 3p5 electron?
 
Not really. But in Be or Ca, you have to start (at least conceptually) from an excited state of the atom, i.e. Be 2s##^2## -> Be 2s##^1##2p##^1##.
 
DrDu said:
Not really. But in Be or Ca, you have to start (at least conceptually) from an excited state of the atom, i.e. Be 2s##^2## -> Be 2s##^1##2p##^1##.
Oh I see! I get it now. Thank you so much! I really appreciate the assistance. :D
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top