Electron Configurations in excited states

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying which electron configurations represent excited states. The configurations provided are 1s2 2s2 2p4 3s1 and [Ar]4s2 3d5 4p1. Participants emphasize using the Aufbau principle to determine ground state configurations and compare them to the given configurations. The first configuration corresponds to an excited state due to an electron being promoted from the 2p to the 3s orbital, while the second configuration is also excited as it deviates from the expected ground state. Overall, the key takeaway is that counting electrons and understanding orbital filling is essential for identifying excited states.
viper2308
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following electron configurations correspond to an excited state? Identify the atoms and write the ground-state electron configuration where appropriate.

1s2 2s2 2p4 3s1
[Ar]4s2 3d5 4p1


Homework Equations


none


The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea what to do. I was able to get 1s2 2s2 3p1 is boron but that is only because I thought it said 1s2 2s2 2p1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
put the last electron back into the previous orbital, - this will give you the ground state. count the total number of electrons, check the periodic table and this will give you the element
 
well, none of those..

==ground state includes the sub-orbitals of "p", which are: Px,Py,Pz (Well, x,y,and z are supposed to be subscripts and p is in lowercase.)

==it should be:
z=26(right?!)
[Ar] 4s2 3d5 4p1 = 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d5 4p1
==1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d5 4px1 4py 4pz

==excited state is more elaborate...

==there...that's it dude..
==well, i suppose you know what's the correct answer,,,
==you've posted a trivia..
==well,,tc:)
 
Count the electrons - that will give you total number of electrons and you will know what element you see.

Write - using Aufbau principle - ground state configuration.

Compare - if it is different, you are excited :smile:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top