Electron-Electron Correlations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Modey3
  • Start date Start date
Modey3
Messages
135
Reaction score
1
Hello,

The "holy grail" for people who do electronic structure research is to obtain a exact expression for the correlation of the electrons. What are the physical aspects of correlation? How is the correlation energy different that the coulombic energy given exactly in the hartree-fock equations? Aren't both energies electron-electron interaction energies? Thanks.

Best Regards

modey3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An important aspect of correlations - one that is missed by HF theory - is that they have a frequency (or time) dependence. If I'm not mistaken, HF theory deals with only what are known as "equal time correlations", which makes it only an approximation, which in some cases, is very poor. So, I'd guess that it is the static nature of HF that is its biggest weakness.

For instance, in the case of the high density (i.e., weakly interacting) electron gas living in a positive background, the HF calculation fails pretty badly. It predicts a dispersion that diverges logarithmically at the Fermi surface (making the Fermi velocity blow up and electron effective mass vanish there, in strong contradiction to measurements).

As we learn from QFT, there are a whole host of interactions with a vacuum state that is continuously spitting out particle-antiparticle pairs that are themselves interacting in a myriad ways that contribute to the overall picture of many-body interactions. The HF calculation is just a partial sum over interaction terms of 2 particular kinds (a forward scattering, or Hartree interaction and an exchange, or Fock interaction term). To avoid the divergence of HF theory for the electron gas, one must go to the next order of interactions, which gives rise to what is known as the Random Phase Approximation.

PS: It would be prudent of you to wait to get a second opinion on this. A theorist's perspective will, no doubt, be more accurate and useful.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top