Electron Falling in Kerr Metric: Release of 40% Rest Energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the release of approximately 40% of an electron's rest energy when transitioning from an unbound orbit to the innermost stable circular orbit around an extremal black hole, as described in Hartle's "Gravity." The key concept is that this energy loss is attributed to the binding energy, which is the difference between the energy of a particle at rest at infinity and its energy in orbit. The binding energy per unit rest mass is expressed as (1-e), indicating the fraction of rest energy that can be released during gravitational binding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kerr black holes and their properties
  • Familiarity with binding energy concepts in gravitational physics
  • Knowledge of fundamental particles and their characteristics
  • Basic principles of general relativity and energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Kerr metric and its implications for particle dynamics
  • Explore the concept of binding energy in gravitational fields
  • Investigate the behavior of fundamental particles in extreme gravitational environments
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students interested in gravitational physics, particularly those studying black hole dynamics and energy interactions of fundamental particles.

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3
I have here a quote from Hartle's Gravity, page 321:

"The fraction of rest energy that can be released in making a transition from an unbound orbit far from an extremal black hole to the most bound innermost stable circular orbit is [itex](1-1/\sqrt{3})\approx 42\%[/itex]".

My question is about releasing an electron into a black hole in precisely this fashion. An electron is a fundamental particle, hence, cannot decay into other fundamental particles. Then how is the electron losing about 40% of its rest energy during this process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would guess that they're just expressing the loss of potential energy as a fraction of the rest energy.
 
bcrowell said:
I would guess that they're just expressing the loss of potential energy as a fraction of the rest energy.

After re-reading over and over again, that seems right. This appears to be the key in that paragraph:

"The binding energy of any orbit is the difference between the energy of a particle at rest at infinity (including rest energy) and the energy of the same particle moving the orbit as measured from infinity. Since [itex]\mathbf{e}[/itex] is the energy measured from infinity per unit rest mass, the binding energy per unit rest mass is [itex]\mathbf{(1-e)}[/itex]. This is the fraction of rest energy that can be released in the process of gravitational binding".

So another way to say this is:

This is the amount of binding energy expressed as a fraction of the rest energy that can be released in the process of gravitational binding.

?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 199 ·
7
Replies
199
Views
22K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
23K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K