Electron in a potential well (numerical problem)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy of an electron in a potential well of width 2 angstroms for various quantum numbers (n). The participant initially arrives at an incorrect energy value of 2.34675(10^20) eV instead of the expected 9.39 eV for n=1, indicating a potential unit error. The correct approach involves using the energy formula E = (n^2π^2ħ^2)/(2mL^2) while ensuring that ħ is converted to joules before converting the final result to eV. A suggestion is made to simplify calculations by using known constants and adjusting units accordingly, particularly by expressing length in nanometers to yield energy in eV.
abstracted6
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The width of the potential well of an electron can be assumed to be 2angstrom. Calculate the energy of an electron (in joules and eV) from this information for various values of n.

I believe I have messed up my units somewhere in the final calculation, but I have included everything before that anyways.

For eV where n=1 the book says the answer is 9.39eV, however I'm getting 2.34675(10^20).

Homework Equations



\nabla^2\psi+\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(E-V)\psi=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Started with
\nabla^2\psi+\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(E-V)\psi=0 Only one direction, and no potential:
\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}+\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}E\psi=0
Letting \alpha=\sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}E}
\therefore\psi(x)=Ae^{i\alpha x}+Be^{-i\alpha x}
Boundary Conditions:
\psi(0)=0=A+B\rightarrow A=-B
\psi(L)=0=Ae^{i\alpha L}+Be^{-i\alpha L}=A(e^{i\alpha L}-e^{-i\alpha L})From the identity:sin(\theta)=\frac{1}{2i}(e^{i\theta}-e^{-i\theta})
\therefore 0=A2isin(\alpha L)\rightarrow \alpha L=n\pi\rightarrow \alpha=\frac{n\pi}{L}
Putting alphas together
\frac{n\pi}{L}=\sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}E}
\therefore E(L)=\frac{n^2\pi^2\hbar^2}{2mL^2}n=1,2,3...

These are the constants I am using for the final calculation:n=1\hbar=6.582(10^{-16})eVsm=9.11(10^{-31})KgL=2(10^{-10})m

I get 2.34675(10^20)eV when it should be 9.39eV.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a problem with the units of measure. Thinking only of units what you have is

\left[\frac{n^2\pi^2\hbar^2}{2mL^2}\right]=\frac{(eV)^2s^2}{kg\cdot m^2}=\frac{eV^2}{J}

which is obvioulsy not in eV. You should work with h bar in joules and, at the end of your calculation, go to eV.
 
abstracted6 said:
These are the constants I am using for the final calculation:n=1\hbar=6.582(10^{-16})eVsm=9.11(10^{-31})KgL=2(10^{-10})m
You can make your life a lot easier if you memorize some common combinations of the constants:
\begin{align*}
\hbar c &= 197\text{ eV nm} \\
mc^2 &= 511000\text{ eV}
\end{align*} If you multiply both the numerator and denominator of the expression for the energy by ##c^2##, you get
$$ E = \frac{n^2\pi^2 (\hbar c)^2}{2 (mc^2) L^2}.$$ If you specify ##L## in nm, you can see that the units of ##E## will be eV.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top