How Does Electron Screening Affect Charged Particle Scattering in Atoms?

MattLiverpool
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Could anyone give me a couple of sentences to what it is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why? school work? :)
 
ansgar said:
why? school work? :)

Partly, mainly just for clarification, its not a question I am just doing some revision, didn't think it was suitable for the homework section. Any help?
 
As I understand it, electron screening is merely the fact that the attractive force on the more outer electrons is less because of the repulsion of the inner electrons between them and the nucleus.
 
In scattering charged particles on atomic nuclei, if the distance of closest approach of the charged particle from the nucleus is roughly the distance of the 1S atomic electrons, the atomic electrons prevent the charged particle from seeing the full charge of the nucleus. This shielding the nucleus by the atomic electrons is called screening.

Bob S
 

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is Maxwell's electromagnetism an effective (field) theory?'

Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
View full post »

Similar threads

I The physical components in the electron double slit experiment
Replies
7
Views
1K
I What is the true nature of microscopic particles when not interacting?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Material Waves and Wave Functions
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Weakly interacting electrons in an atom
Replies
2
Views
2K
I About the position of electrons (uncertainty)
Replies
6
Views
3K
I The Central Field Approximation for Many-Electron Atoms
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Experimental values for screening constants? (Slater rules)
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Virtual Particles and Charge Screening
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Particle field strength and sensitivity
Replies
0
Views
773
A Interaction between neutrons and nuclei during scattering
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top