Electronics engineering vs material science engineering?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between electronics engineering and materials science engineering, specifically focusing on which field is more physics-based and which is considered more prestigious. Participants explore the implications of these fields in terms of career prospects and cultural perceptions of prestige.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about which field is more physics-based and prestigious, indicating a desire for comparative analysis.
  • One participant shares anecdotal evidence that some physics majors transitioned to electrical engineering due to job market challenges, suggesting a perceived difficulty in securing employment with a physics degree alone.
  • Another participant notes that the perception of prestige can vary significantly by culture, citing examples from Iran and China regarding the status of different fields.
  • A later reply asserts that materials science is more physics-based, although this claim is not universally agreed upon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on which field is more physics-based and prestigious, indicating that there is no consensus on these questions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the prestige of a field may depend on cultural context and individual program characteristics, which introduces variability in the discussion.

miray dicle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
which one is more physics based? which one is more prestigious?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I tell my children, google search for the top 10 paying degrees.

http://www.affordable-online-colleges.net/top-10-valuable-engineering-degrees-employers/

Two of my classmates in EE were physics majors, they found it was tough to get a job without getting a Phd so they took the EE route.

Most prestigious... that's kind of a loaded question in a forum, but your professors can offer advice here.

My advice? Go for EE, take a lot of CS classes (make sure you take C/C++ over java. Focus on systems design / compilers) and take a few digital classes.. I worked pretty close to the metal for most of my career, but I had a career that spanned all levels of engineering and across disciplines. Then start buying real estate before you are 40 and become obsolete in the field and become a landlord... which makes it a lot easier to retire before you are 50.

I tell my older daughter to check out the actuary field, man what a gravy job and it pays well for smart people with backgrounds in math and physics.
 
miray dicle said:
which one is more physics based? which one is more prestigious?
This really depends on the program/adviser if you're talking about research. Also it depends on the culture which is regarded as more prestigious, but I think chasing prestige is rarely a good idea anyway. An Iranian friend told me that electrical engineering is considered the highest field in Iran, whereas a friend from China told me that mathematics is considered to be the highest field in China, so the silly field hierarchy will vary from place to place.
 
miray dicle said:
which one is more physics based?

materials science
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K