miray dicle
- 2
- 0
which one is more physics based? which one is more prestigious?
The discussion revolves around the comparison between electronics engineering and materials science engineering, specifically focusing on which field is more physics-based and which is considered more prestigious. Participants explore the implications of these fields in terms of career prospects and cultural perceptions of prestige.
Participants express differing views on which field is more physics-based and prestigious, indicating that there is no consensus on these questions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Participants acknowledge that the prestige of a field may depend on cultural context and individual program characteristics, which introduces variability in the discussion.
This really depends on the program/adviser if you're talking about research. Also it depends on the culture which is regarded as more prestigious, but I think chasing prestige is rarely a good idea anyway. An Iranian friend told me that electrical engineering is considered the highest field in Iran, whereas a friend from China told me that mathematics is considered to be the highest field in China, so the silly field hierarchy will vary from place to place.miray dicle said:which one is more physics based? which one is more prestigious?
miray dicle said:which one is more physics based?