Electrons causing nuclear decay

AI Thread Summary
Electrons play a significant role in nuclear decay, particularly in processes like electron capture, where a nucleus absorbs an atomic electron. This interaction can lead to the emission of X-rays or Auger electrons as the atom adjusts to fill the vacancy left by the captured electron. The discussion highlights the distinction between different decay modes, such as beta minus decay and electron capture. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for grasping the complexities of nuclear decay. Overall, the interplay between electrons and nuclear processes is a nuanced topic worth exploring further.
omiros
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody, I am a first year and I have one more question.

To what degree do electron contribute to nuclear decay?

(Do electron which can 'spend' some time in the nucleus cause bigger decay?)

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Omiros, :confused: What the heck, you just posted a thread on this very same topic two days ago.
 
Bill_K said:
Omiros, :confused: What the heck, you just posted a thread on this very same topic two days ago.

Hahaha that one was about beta minus decay. This about bound electrons causing a decay. Not the products of it :)
 
omiros said:
Hahaha that one was about beta minus decay. This about bound electrons causing a decay. Not the products of it :)
Well I answered this question in the previous thread, so here is my answer again.
A more interesting example of the interplay between nuclear decay and the atomic electrons is an alternative decay mode to beta plus decay called electron capture or K-capture, in which the nucleus grabs an atomic electron. Since this electron is taken from a low-lying shell, the atom needs to fill the hole, by emitting an X-ray, or sometimes a second ("Auger") electron.
 
Bill_K said:
Well I answered this question in the previous thread, so here is my answer again.

I really did understand something completely different. Probably I was thinking other stuff, so I adapted these words into what I wanted to understand. Thanks again though.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top