Electrons, Muons and Pauli Exclusion

jimgraber
Gold Member
Messages
247
Reaction score
18
Lepton Universality and Pauli Exclusion

Put in a possibly oversimplified way, lepton universality says that electrons, muons, and taus all behave in the same way except for mass effects. The question is “Does this apply to Pauli exclusion?”

Due to the Pauli exclusion principle, only two electrons can be in the s orbital, and hence in the ground state of regular beryllium, two electrons are in the s orbital, and two electrons are in the p orbital. My question is what happens in the ground state of dimuonic beryllium, with two muons and two electrons. Are all four particles in s orbitals, or are two in s orbitals and two in p orbitals?

A similar question can be asked about muonic lithium, which would be easier to create experimentally.
i.e., in muonic lithium, with one electron replaced by a muon, can all three leptons be in the s orbital?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jimgraber said:
Are all four particles in s orbitals

Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
The Pauli exclusion principle applies to indistinguishable particles. Electrons and muons are distinguishable because of their different masses.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top