Electrons - Relativistic velocity addition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the relative speed of two electrons moving at c/2 in perpendicular directions. The initial approach using the Pythagorean theorem for velocity addition is deemed incorrect due to the relativistic speeds involved. Instead, the proper method requires applying the principles of special relativity for accurate results. Participants emphasize the importance of using relativistic velocity addition rather than classical methods. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted exchange about the assignment's progress.
charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0
electrons -- Relativistic velocity addition...

Homework Statement



an observer measures the velocity of two electrons, finding one with a speed c/2 in the x direction and the other c/2 in the y direction. what is the relative speed of the two electrons.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Im not sure if this is right it seemed to easy.

but suppose that electron 1 is called b and the other a

then v(b)= √(c2/4+c2/4)
since they are at right angles to each other. is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The velocities are very high, you need to use special relativity here.
 


charmedbeauty said:

Homework Statement



an observer measures the velocity of two electrons, finding one with a speed c/2 in the x direction and the other c/2 in the y direction. what is the relative speed of the two electrons.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Im not sure if this is right it seemed to easy.

but suppose that electron 1 is called b and the other a

then v(b)= √(c2/4+c2/4)
since they are at right angles to each other. is this right?

No. That is a non-relativistic velocity-addition and would give you the right answer for a speeding bullet on Earth but NOT for things traveling at relativistic speeds.

Google relativistic velocity addition
 


voko said:
The velocities are very high, you need to use special relativity here.

phinds said:
No. That is a non-relativistic velocity-addition and would give you the right answer for a speeding bullet on Earth but NOT for things traveling at relativistic speeds.

Google relativistic velocity addition

oh yeah that makes sense ok cool thanks.
 


How did you go with the rest of the assignment =P
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top