Electrophoresis kinetic friction or not?

AI Thread Summary
Electrophoresis separates particles based on charge and size, with mobility influenced by viscosity. The least dense particles move less due to higher volume and increased resistance, contrary to expectations that lower density should allow for greater movement. The resistance in electrophoresis is related to viscous effects rather than kinetic friction. This means that the mobility of particles is affected by their size and charge in a viscous medium. Understanding these factors is crucial for interpreting results in techniques like Western Blots.
sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone,

In electrophoresis the least dense one moved less (other factors been the same for every particle). I'm assuming this is due to higher volume and more resistance but, doesn't electrophoresis measure kinetic friction, so the one with lowest density should move further. What kind of resistance does electrophoresis refer to. Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are talking about, for example, Western Blots, 'friction' is manifested in terms of viscosity- the process separates substances by charge and size, and the mobility of the charged (mobile) phase depends on viscous effects (which are related back to the charge and size).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top