Electroplating from tungsten via phosphate salt?

AI Thread Summary
Tungsten exhibits high resistance to diluted phosphoric acid in the absence of air but dissolves readily in concentrated acid. The proposed reaction involving tungsten and phosphoric acid suggests the formation of tungsten phosphate, potentially W(PO4)2, due to tungsten's ability to exhibit various oxidation states from +6 to -2. The discussion raises questions about the feasibility of using tungsten phosphate for electroplating, noting the lack of available information on tungsten compounds, which complicates the identification of suitable compounds for this purpose. Additionally, it is highlighted that in aqueous solutions, tungsten does not exist as a free cation but rather in monomeric or dimeric forms, indicating a strong affinity for oxygen that prevents the formation of a stable metal/metal ion system. This characteristic makes tungsten's electrochemical behavior complex and potentially limits its applications in electroplating.
jrodatus
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
At the bottom of page 54 of Tungsten: Properties, Chemistry, Technology of the Elements, Alloys, and Chemical Compounds by Lassner and Schubert:

Phosphoric acid (H3PO4): Tungsten is highly resistant to diluted phosphoric acid as long as air is excluded. It dissolves easily in concentrated acid.

I'm presuming the reaction goes something like 2H_{3}PO_{4} + 2W → 3H_{2} + 2WPO_{4}

Since I'm pretty sure copper phosphate works just fine for electroplating, why wouldn't tungsten phosphate? What's the difference? The absence of any Google info on this makes me think there must be some good reason why it won't work.

But it sure would be useful for a particular project. Would appreciate input!
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I think the result is more like W(PO4)2, since phosphate is -3 while W can be +6. Since tungsten has several oxidation states running from +6 to -2, there may be different compositions.
 
SteamKing said:
I think the result is more like W(PO4)2, since phosphate is -3 while W can be +6. Since tungsten has several oxidation states running from +6 to -2, there may be different compositions.

Okay, assuming W loses all 6 electrons like it can, that sounds like a pretty strong bond. I suppose it would be insoluble in pretty much anything. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Sections 3.7 and 3.8 of your reference also discuss some aspects of electroplating with tungsten. Apparently, not much is known about tungsten compounds and this lack of information makes it difficult to determine which compounds are the most suitable.
 
SteamKing said:
Sections 3.7 and 3.8 of your reference also discuss some aspects of electroplating with tungsten.

Doh, thank you again. From page 123:

In aqueous solution, no oxygen-free tungsten cation exists but only monomeric or dimeric species like WO^{2+}_{2}. Tungsten, due to its great affinity to oxygen, may never form a metal/metal ion electrode system but always a metal/metal oxide/metal ion system, which is quite irreversible.

(Just posting it here for reference. Hope that's not a copyright violation.)
 
Nope. You aren't claiming the work is your own, and it falls under what is known as 'fair use'.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
Back
Top