Electrostatic Potential Minimum: Equilibrium for Positive or Negative Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phantom113
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An electrostatic potential minimum serves as an equilibrium point for positive charges, similar to a marble resting at the bottom of a concave bowl, where it returns to the minimum when disturbed. In contrast, for negative charges, the minimum acts like the top of a convex bowl, causing the charge to roll away if nudged. The discussion clarifies that field lines direct positive charges from higher to lower potential, while negative charges behave oppositely. Understanding these concepts helps in grasping the nature of equilibrium points in electrostatics. The analogy effectively illustrates the behavior of different charge types in relation to electrostatic potential.
phantom113
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that the electrostatic potential has a minimum at some point. Is this an equilibrium point for a positive charge? For a negative charge?

I simply don't understand what the question is asking - what is an equilibrium point? A restatement would be terrific.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the field lines are ⊥ to the equipotential surfaces, and if you have a minimum at some point in the field, won't there be field lines pointing from more positive potentials toward the minimum? Which kind of charges travel along field lines from higher to lower E field equipotential surfaces?
 
phantom113 said:

Homework Statement



Suppose that the electrostatic potential has a minimum at some point. Is this an equilibrium point for a positive charge? For a negative charge?

I simply don't understand what the question is asking - what is an equilibrium point? A restatement would be terrific.

Thanks.

Let's use an analogy. suppose you had a hemispherical bowl and a marble. With the concave side of the bowl up if you placed the marble in the bottom and then pushed it to the side a little it would roll back. On the other hand if the bowl had the convex side up and you placed the marble on the top and then nudged it a bit it would roll off.

Well your electrostatics problem is like that. for charge of one sign the minimum of the electrostatic potential acts like the bowl is concave up and if you nudge the charge a little, it "sinks to the bottom". For charge of the other sign the minimum of the electrostatic potential acts like the bowl is upside down. If you nudge the charge a bit it will move off.

Does that help?
 
Yes very much. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top