Electrostatics charged spheres problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two problems related to electrostatics involving charged spheres and a charged wire ring. The first problem addresses the charge leakage from two equally charged spheres, explaining that environmental factors like atmospheric ions and moisture can cause charge loss. The second problem involves calculating the force on a wire ring when a point charge is placed at its center, with the suggestion to use integration to find the force on individual elements of the ring. The participants emphasize the complexity of the mathematical formulations and the necessity of understanding the charge leakage in the first problem. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges in solving these electrostatic problems and the underlying principles at play.
Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
1)Two small equally charged spheres, each of mass m, are suspended from the same point by silk threads of length l.The distance between the spheres x<<l.Find the rate dq/dt with which the charge leaks off each sphere if their approach velocity varies as v=a/(x)^0.5, a is a constant.
The problem can be done by expressing q^2 in equilibrium condition and then differentiating w.r.t. time.But I wonder why the charge leakage will occur?What principle makes it and how?
2)A thin wire ring of radius R has an electric charge q. What will be the increment of the force streatching the wire if a point charge qo is placed at the ring's centre?
It appeared to me that the direct mathematical formulation of E field, inside and outside the ring is rather difficult.so i tried to calculate the potential due to the ring and point charge.But, the integration to find contribution of the ring turned hopelessly difficult.Please help.
Kolahal Bhattacharya.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Due to ions in atmosphere cancelling charges on the spheres. These charged particles can originate from various sources - natural radioactivity in the vicinity/ground/materials in the surroundings.

A larger source of discharge works as follows. Any uncharged particle approaching the sphere will be induced with an opposite charge closest to the sphere. This will attract it to the sphere. Once stuck on it it will gain the same charge as the sphere (the particle was initially neutral). Now it will be repelled by the sphere, flying off into space carrying away some of the charge on the sphere.

Another possible route of discharge happens when the threads absorb moisture out of the atmosphere. This will make them conductive, providing a path for discharge.
 
Last edited:
I understand.But could you please clarify, what feature of this problem makes the charged sphere to gradually leak out the charge.In other words, why the charge leakage is necessary in this problem?
What about my next problem?
 
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
I understand.But could you please clarify, what feature of this problem makes the charged sphere to gradually leak out the charge.In other words, why the charge leakage is necessary in this problem?

To be honest with you, this is one of Irodov's artificial sounding problems :smile:

What about my next problem?

On-axis field due to a ring is fairly easy to compute. But you don't need it here.

When you place the point charge at the center of the ring, the ring experiences a net outward (repulsive) force. Can you calculate the force on an element of the ring due to the charge and integrate it?
 
I did it:
dF=k ∫(q0λdl)/r^2
put dl=r dφ
have dF=k ∫(q0λr dφ)/r^2
Then, dF=(kq0λ/r) ∫dφ
integrating o to 2 pi, F=...
The answer is (Irodov):∆T=(qqo)/(8π^2ε0r^2)
So this is not the way you led.
 
Yeah that's it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top