Electrostatics: Finding Equilibrium with Three Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatic
AI Thread Summary
To find the position of a third charge for equilibrium with a +3 charge at the origin and a -7 charge at 0.5m, the equation 3/r^2 = -7/(0.5+r)^2 is established. The user struggles with algebraic manipulation to solve for r, particularly in balancing positive and negative terms. They attempt to rearrange the equation but receive conflicting results compared to the textbook answer. The discussion highlights the complexity of determining the correct position based on the signs of the charges involved. Clarifications and further assistance are sought to resolve the discrepancies in calculations.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Say there is a charge of +3 at the origin and a charge of -7 at .5m Where would a third charge of arbitrary sign have to be for equilibrium to be reached?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


so I've widdled this down to 3 / r^2 = -7/(.5+r)^2 but am having problems solving for r. Algebra is tough! anyone want to give me tips here? In the equation I have I already divided out the third charge and the k term.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PsychonautQQ said:
so I've widdled this down to 3 / r^2 = -7/(.5+r)^2 but am having problems solving for r. Algebra is tough!
It's particularly tough when you try to make a determinedly positive term equal an insistently negative one :wink:. The signs depend on whether the test charge is placed left or right of the given charges.
 
Ahh right! So I could just do 3/r^2 = 7/(.5+r)^2?
Following up would give...
sqrt(3/7) = (.5+r)/r??
sqrt(3/7)*r = .5 + r
0 = .5 + r - sqrt(3/7)*r
0 = .5 + .345346*r
-.5 / .345346 = r would mean r is -1.4478.. But the back of the book says otherwise ;-( what did I do wrong here?
 
Yo shane, if you are reading this you should email me the title/author of your textbook and the problem number and i'll have a clearer solution posted here tonight
 
yo check your email shane
 
PsychonautQQ said:
Ahh right! So I could just do 3/r^2 = 7/(.5+r)^2?
Right.
Following up would give...
sqrt(3/7) = (.5+r)/r??
Wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top