Electrostatics: suspended spheres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between two charged spheres suspended from strings, where one sphere has charge Q and the other has 2Q. The angles theta1 and theta2 that the strings make with the vertical are related by the ratio of their charges, leading to the equation cos(theta1)/cos(theta2) = 2. By applying the small angle approximation and using the law of cosines, the distance r between the spheres can be derived as r ≈ (4k_eQ^2L)/(mg)^(1/3). This relationship highlights the balance between gravitational and electrostatic forces acting on the spheres. The analysis effectively combines principles of electrostatics and mechanics to derive the distance formula.
AgPIper
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Two small spheres of mass m are suspended from strings of length L that are connected at a common point.

One sphere has charge Q, the other has 2Q.

The strings make angles (theta1) and (theta2) with the vertical.

(a) How are theta1 and theta2 related?

(b) Assume theta1 and theta2 are small. Show that the distance r between the spheres is

r \approx \frac {4k_eQ^2L}{mg}
supposed to be a paren around the whole fraction... :rolleyes: the whole thing raised to 1/3 power

Thanks very much for answering :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
because of the third Newton's law and considering coulombs law -->
Tsin(theta_1)=2K(Q^2)/(R^2)=Tsin(theta_2)--> theta_1=theta_2=theta
working on the vertical axis --> Tcos(theta)=mg...(1) and on horizontal axis
Tsin(theta)=2K(Q^2)/(R^2)...(2) now dividing (2)/(1)-->
tan(theta)=2K(Q^2)/(mg*(R^2)) and because theta_1=theta_2-->
sin(theta)=(R/2)/L=R/2L, according to the condition of theta being small-->
sin(theta)~(theta)~tan(theta)--> R/2L~2K(Q^2)/(mg*(R^2))-->
(R^3)~4KL(Q^2)/mg. check dimensions and you'll see that r suppose to be (r^3)
 


(a) Theta1 and theta2 are related by the ratio of their charges, Q and 2Q. Since the strings are connected at a common point, the force of gravity acting on the spheres must be balanced by the electrostatic force. This means that the tension in the strings must be equal. Therefore, we can use the law of cosines to relate the angles:

Tension = mgcos(theta1) = 2mgcos(theta2)

Dividing the two equations, we get:

cos(theta1)/cos(theta2) = 2

Therefore, theta1 and theta2 are related by:

theta1 = arccos(2cos(theta2))

(b) We can use the small angle approximation, where cos(theta) ≈ 1 - (theta^2)/2, to simplify the equation for theta1:

theta1 ≈ arccos(2(1 - (theta2^2)/2))

Using the law of cosines again, we can relate theta2 to the distance r between the spheres:

r = 2Lcos(theta2)

Substituting this into the equation for theta1, we get:

theta1 ≈ arccos(2(1 - (r^2)/(4L^2)))

Now, we can use the Taylor series expansion for arccos(x) = √(1-x^2) to approximate the equation further:

theta1 ≈ (√(1-2(1-(r^2)/(4L^2))) ≈ (√(r^2)/(4L^2))

Finally, using the small angle approximation again, we can simplify this to:

theta1 ≈ r/(2L)

Now, we can plug this back into the equation for the distance r:

r ≈ 4Lcos(theta2) ≈ 4Lcos(theta1/(2L)) ≈ 4Lcos(r/(4L))

Solving for r, we get:

r ≈ (4k_eQ^2L)/(mg)

Therefore, the distance between the spheres is approximately equal to (4k_eQ^2L)/(mg)^(1/3), as given in the question.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top