Eletric potential created by a homogenously charged disc

victorcell
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've to demonstrate the electric potential that a charge q feels when it's broght from infinite to a point z. The problem is that every demonstration i found out there starts with the definition of potential eletric as dV = k. dq/ r²; but i cannot use that, 'cause my professor wants us to go with delta V = - integral ( E. dl). no problem to find the eletric field though. The issue regard the integral

Homework Equations



After the integration, when dealing with the limits, infinite and z, the result comes down to + and - infinite, which is clearly an indertermination mathematicaly speaking, in spite of that, if I'm allowed to cancel that out, the result is just perfect. I am posting the picture of what I've done, I've canceled the infinites justifying by the definition of electric potential been zero at r=infinite; but i am not sure that this is allowed.. thanks for the help
 

Attachments

  • Potencial de um disco carregado 001.jpg
    Potencial de um disco carregado 001.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 526
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, victorcell. Welcome to PF!

To handle the limit of the integral at z = ∞, you need to evaluate $$ \lim_{z \to \infty} (\sqrt{z^2+R^2} - z)$$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top