Why Are My Elevator Tension Calculations Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ur5pointos2sl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the tensions in two cables connected to masses m1 (2.00 kg) and m2 (4.00 kg) in a downward-accelerating elevator. Initial calculations led to confusion regarding the forces acting on the masses, particularly the incorrect application of force balance equations. Participants pointed out mistakes in the free body diagrams and emphasized the need to account for the elevator's acceleration. After revisiting the calculations, one participant confirmed that the tension in cable A (Fa) was correctly calculated as 19.6 N, while the tension in cable B (Fb) was recalculated to be 29.4 N. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying Newton's laws in dynamic scenarios.
ur5pointos2sl
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
My answers for this problem aren't correct. Can anyone please help me spot my mistake. Thanks.


Inside the elevator, masses m1 = 2.00kg and m2 = 4.00 kg are conncted by a cable A. Mass m1 is connected to the roof of the elevator by a cable B. The elevator has a downward acceleration of g/2. Calculate the tensions in cables A and B.

m1 = 2.00 kg
m2 = 4.00 kg
a = 9.8/2

I set up two free body diagrams.. One for m1 and one for m2

So for m1 FBD

SUMFy= 0 = Fb - 2(9.8/2) - Fa
Fb = 9.8 N

for m2 FBD

SUMFy = 0 = Fa - mg
Fa = 4(9.8/2) = 19.6 N NOW PLUGGING BACK IN
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no answers to check. When you post them, we will check them. Nevertheless, I can see mistakes already. You say

SUMFy = 0 = Fa - mg

Why is the sum of all the forces in the y-direction zero? Are the masses not accelerating?

Also, when you say "mg" which mass are you talking about, 1 or 2?
 
kuruman said:
There are no answers to check. When you post them, we will check them. Nevertheless, I can see mistakes already. You say

SUMFy = 0 = Fa - mg

Why is the sum of all the forces in the y-direction zero? Are the masses not accelerating?

Also, when you say "mg" which mass are you talking about, 1 or 2?

m1 = 2.00kg m2 = 4.00 kg

ok let me try this over..

FBD of m1...so here the mg will be 2kg (9.8) or would it be 2(9.8/2)?

so SUMFy = Fb - Fa - mg = ma
= Fb - Fa -(2)(9.8)=2(-9.8/2)
Fb = -9.8 N which couldn't be possible since its in tension

FBD of m2...so here mg will be 4kg (-9.8/2)?

so SUMFy= Fa - 4(9.8)= 4(-9.8/2)
Fa = 19.6 N

again I am getting the same answers as before..
 
ur5pointos2sl said:
so SUMFy = Fb - Fa - mg = ma
= Fb - Fa -(2)(9.8)=2(-9.8/2)
Fb = -9.8 N which couldn't be possible since its in tension

How did you get -9.8 N? I don't get that when I put in the numbers. Check your algebra.

so SUMFy= Fa - 4(9.8)= 4(-9.8/2)
Fa = 19.6 N
This looks correct. Do you think it is not?
 
kuruman said:
How did you get -9.8 N? I don't get that when I put in the numbers. Check your algebra.


This looks correct. Do you think it is not?


The instructor said 19.6 N was not the correct answer. I am not really sure of the actual correct answer.

I checked my algebra again for Fb and ended up getting 49N. I really am not sure what to think now.
 
The Fa = 19.6 N is correct. I agree with your instructor. Now show me exactly what you do after you write down

Fb - Fa -(2)(9.8)=2(-9.8/2)
 
kuruman said:
The Fa = 19.6 N is correct. I agree with your instructor. Now show me exactly what you do after you write down

Fb - Fa -(2)(9.8)=2(-9.8/2)

Fb - 19.6 -(2)(9.8)=2(-9.8/2)

Fb = 19.6 + 98/5 - 49/5
= 29.4 N
 
Looks good. I think you are done.
 
Back
Top