Elliptical Orbits and Resonance of Eccentricities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ian J.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Resonance
AI Thread Summary
In systems with multiple orbiting bodies, the eccentricity of one body's orbit can significantly affect the eccentricities of others, leading to instability for those with high eccentricity. This instability often results in bodies being ejected from the system or transitioning to new orbits, which contributes to the prevalence of near-circular orbits in the Solar System. Additionally, mutual interactions among objects in random elliptical orbits will eventually cause them to settle into similar orbital shapes. The alignment of orbits in the same plane is attributed to the initial conditions of the protoplanetary disc from which the Solar System formed. Overall, these dynamics illustrate the complex interplay between gravitational influences and orbital characteristics in celestial mechanics.
Ian J.
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Dumb Question #1251:

What I understand so far (which maybe incomplete or wrong): in any system with multiple objects orbiting a larger body (either star+planets or planet+moons) each body can have an influence on the others, such that large bodies such as stars and big gas giants have a common barycenter for their elliptical orbits (e.g. Sun - Jupiter), and that there can be resonance in the orbits such that the orbital periods are related (2:1; 3:2; 5:1; etc).

What I want to know is:

1. How much of an effect does the eccentricity of anyone body's orbit affect the eccentricity of the other bodies' orbits, significantly or insignificantly?

2. In the evolution of a system, does any resonance for the eccentricities of the orbits settle down to an observable pattern (similar to the resonance of the orbit periods)?

TIA

Ian
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Any body that is significantly different in eccentricity from all the others will tend to end up unhappy - flung out of the system or into a new orbit. This is why the Solar System features mostly near-circular orbits. Objects in random elliptical orbits would keep interacting until they settled down into something similar. Even if the major axes of all the ellipses were in one exact line, they would soon be scattered by mutual interactions.

As far as how much each object affects the others, hard to say without specifying exact circumstances - and then you are getting deep into celestial mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
:thumbs: Thanks for that, that's actually quite a reassuring answer :smile:
 
tfr000 said:
Any body that is significantly different in eccentricity from all the others will tend to end up unhappy - flung out of the system or into a new orbit. This is why the Solar System features mostly near-circular orbits. Objects in random elliptical orbits would keep interacting until they settled down into something similar. Even if the major axes of all the ellipses were in one exact line, they would soon be scattered by mutual interactions.

I'm happy with that answer. How do you explain that most orbits in the solar system are in the same plane, is it a similar argument?
 
Devils said:
How do you explain that most orbits in the solar system are in the same plane, is it a similar argument?
It's got more to do with the way the cloud of gas that ended up as our Solar System collapsed. By the time planets started to form, most of the material was already orbiting close to a single plane(the protoplanetary disc).
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top