EM and Gravitational binding energy for quarks

Kenai
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

If I have a \Sigma triplet of baryons, how do I calculate the EM and gravitational binding energy of these baryons? (assuming there is 1fm of distance between quarks and that each quark has 1/3 the mass of the \Sigma),

I guess I have to use the EM and Gravitational Potential Energies for this.

Will be ok using the Rydberg Energy Formula for thr EM binding energie?

E = \frac{1}{2} {\alpha}^2 (\mu {c}^2)

With \mu being the reduced mass.

http://books.google.com.pe/books?id...ge&q="electromagnetic binding energy"&f=false

And what about the Gravitational thing? (just U = G m1m2 /r ?)

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kenai said:
And what about the Gravitational thing? (just U = G m1m2 /r ?)
If you just want an order of magnitude estimate, then this will work, and the directly analogous equation for the electrical force will also work. If you want an accurate number, you'd have to devote the next decade if your life to learning to do numerical QCD calculations. The gravitational energy is of course negligible for any practical purpose.
 
The gravitational energy is negligible, and is never considered.
You can't use the Rydberg formula for the EM energy because the quarks are not held together by EM, but by strong forces.
There are three components to the energy differences:
!. Coulomb ~ qq'/r^2.
2. A spin dot spin magnetic term.
3. A spin dot spin QCD term.

They are all of comparable size ~ 1 MeV.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top