EM field and wave interactions of a point charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interactions of electromagnetic (EM) fields and waves generated by point charges in static equilibrium. When one charge is moved, the resulting change in the EM field propagates at the speed of light, affecting the other charge and causing it to accelerate to restore equilibrium. The conversation explores the complexities of calculating the frequency and wavelength of emitted photons in this scenario, noting that the motion of the charges is likely aperiodic, complicating the assignment of a frequency. It emphasizes that frequency pertains to periodic waves, requiring specific types of charge motion to produce coherent light. Understanding the connection between energy, frequency, and the Planck constant is crucial, suggesting a foundational knowledge of classical light theory before delving into quantum mechanics.
mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
I've been thinking of 2 point charges separated by some distance in static equilibrium. When one charge is moved from rest, the EM field would change the way it looks at the location of the other point charge. This "changing in the looks" of the EM field as I understand propagates from the first charge at the speed of light and constitutes an EM wave. This is easy to see using a computer simulation that allows dragging charges around. When the change in the EM field reaches the other point charge it accelerates, trying to restore equilibrium.

So, I know about cases where an excited atom returns to its ground state and how to calculate the frequency and wavelength of the emitted photon. I'm wondering how I might do that with the somewhat unreal situation above. Could I just consider the work done on the second charge to be equal to the light's energy, then divide by Planck's constant to get frequency (if both charges had charge e)? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The nature of the light will depend on how the charges move. In such general situation as you described, the motion would be most probably aperiodic, so the light will move in all directions in a complicated way. One cannot assign frequency to it in such situation (one can resolve it into Fourier components, but the result would be complicated as well.)

Frequency is a quantity which refers to periodic wave, like sine wave. In order to get such wave, the charges have to move periodically - in circles in synchrotron, or around each other, like in excited state of hydrogen atom, or oscillate rectilinearly as in antenna.
 
Thanks, I never thought of it that way.
 
No problem. From your post, it seems you learned bit about quanta. The Planck constant and the connection between the energy and frequency is important, but rather subtle and not entirely clear, so I recommend to learn bit about the classical theory of light (wave optics/electrodynamics ) which is quite clear and natural, and only then move on to learn about the quantum theory.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top