Fourier Transform Homework: Solving P(t) with E(t_1) & E(t_2)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Fourier transform of the expression P(t), which involves the integral of a function chi and the product of two functions E(t1) and E(t2). The user is attempting to rewrite the Fourier transform to compare terms on both sides of the equation. There is confusion regarding how to handle the integrals over t1 and t2 after rewriting the expression. The user seeks guidance on how to proceed from this point in their homework. Clarification on the treatment of the integrals and further steps in the transformation process are needed.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I wish to Fourier transform the following expression

<br /> P(t) = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 \chi (t - t_1 ,t - t_2 )E(t_1 )E(t_2 )} <br />

What I do is the following

<br /> \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {P(\omega )e^{ - i\omega t} } = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 d\omega _1 d\omega _2 \,\chi (\omega _1 ,\omega _2 )E(\omega _1 )E(\omega _2 )e^{ - i\omega _1 (t - t_1 )} e^{ - i\omega _2 (t - t_2 )} e^{ - i\omega _1 t_1 } e^{ - i\omega _2 t_2 } } <br />

I'm pretty sure I need to keep rewriting the expressions on the LHS and RHS until I reach a point, where I can compare the terms to each other. But do you have a hint for what I need to do from here?

Cheers,
Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, so what we have is

<br /> \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {d\omega P(\omega )e^{ - i\omega t} } = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 d\omega _1 d\omega _2 \,\chi (\omega _1 ,\omega _2 )E(\omega _1 )E(\omega _2 )e^{ - i\omega _1 (t - t_1 )} e^{ - i\omega _2 (t - t_2 )} e^{ - i\omega _1 t_1 } e^{ - i\omega _2 t_2 } } <br />
<br /> \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {d\omega P(\omega )e^{ - i\omega t} } = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {dt_1 dt_2 d\omega _1 d\omega _2 \,\chi (\omega _1 ,\omega _2 )E(\omega _1 )E(\omega _2 )e^{ - i\omega _1 t} e^{ - i\omega _2 t}} <br />

But this seems a little odd, because what am I supposed to do about the integral over t1 and t2?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top