EM vs Neutrino interactions w matter

BWV
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
1,928
basic question- neutrinos pass through matter because they are only subject to the weak interaction whereas photons interact with matter because they are subject to EM? Does the small mass of the neutrino contribute to this - if there was a neutrino with the mass of a proton how differently would it interact with matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BWV said:
basic question- neutrinos pass through matter because they are only subject to the weak interaction whereas photons interact with matter because they are subject to EM?
Yes, sort of. Neutrinos do interact with matter, just not very much (the mean free path of neutrinos is 1 light year of lead). This is because they only interact through the weak interaction, yes.

BWV said:
Does the small mass of the neutrino contribute to this - if there was a neutrino with the mass of a proton how differently would it interact with matter?
Not much in terms of interaction strength, but the signatures would be different (this is just kinematics - the recoil would be more). Further, there would be a bunch of other cosmological affects if the neutrino had a 1 GeV mass, and neutrino mixing would look different. Someone who knows more about neutrinos would be able to say more/correct me.
 
e.bar.goum said:
the mean free path of neutrinos is 1 light year of lead

This is a statement taken out of context and that has become far too generalised. The mean-free path of neutrinos depend ln the neutrino energy. For example, the Earth is opaque to neutrinos at very high neutrino energies, such as the ultra-high energy neutrinos observed by IceCube.
 
Orodruin said:
This is a statement taken out of context and that has become far too generalised. The mean-free path of neutrinos depend ln the neutrino energy. For example, the Earth is opaque to neutrinos at very high neutrino energies, such as the ultra-high energy neutrinos observed by IceCube.
Point taken.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top