EM wave at a plane dielectric boundary

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of electromagnetic waves at a dielectric boundary, specifically regarding the relationship between electric field amplitude and intrinsic impedances of two media. When the intrinsic impedance of the second medium (n2) is greater than that of the first (n1), the amplitude of the electric field at the boundary increases. This increase in amplitude is attributed to the properties of the reflection and transmission coefficients for the wave as it crosses the boundary. The conversation emphasizes that since both media are lossless, there will be no decay of the wave, allowing for a clear analysis of amplitude changes. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately describing the behavior of EM waves at dielectric interfaces.
erece
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
i was studying incidence of EM wave at a plane dielectric boundary and encountered equations
in the attachment . I just want to know if n2 > n1 then electric field amplitude at the boundary increases . So from where does this extra value comes ?
n1 and n2 are intrinsic impedances of 1st and 2nd medium
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    9.6 KB · Views: 478
Engineering news on Phys.org
erece said:
i was studying incidence of EM wave at a plane dielectric boundary and encountered equations
in the attachment . I just want to know if n2 > n1 then electric field amplitude at the boundary increases . So from where does this extra value comes ?
n1 and n2 are intrinsic impedances of 1st and 2nd medium

I think you've mixed up the wording a little here.

We are talking about an electromagnetic plane wave at a dielectric boundary.

The two equations you have in your figure are the reflection and transmission coefficients for an EM plane wave across two media. (i.e. media 1 having intrinsic impedance η1, media 2 having intrinsic impedance η2)

If they are dielectric media then they are lossless and we will see no decay or the wave as it travels through the mediums. (i.e. the attenuation constants are zero, α1 = 0, α2 = 0)

Why not write an expression for the electric field at the boundary and see if you can justify whether or not the amplitude will increase of decrease based on the values of η1 and η2.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top