Embedded ADC with external Signal Conditioning

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdanderson04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Adc Signal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding an embedded board with an external signal conditioning stage for data acquisition, specifically for a small analog voltage range of 0-5V. Users highlight the advantages of using external ADCs for flexibility in precision and noise immunity compared to System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions. Recommendations include exploring options from National Instruments and Omega for various ADC modules. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting a microcontroller that aligns with the desired ADC and signal conditioning setup. Ultimately, the choice between external ADCs and integrated solutions depends on the project's specific requirements and priorities.
cdanderson04
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello all:

This is my first post on the physics forum so I am excited to have found such a great community of scientists.

My problem is that I have been looking for an embedded board that contains an ADC but has a very good external signal conditioning stage. This will be for a data acquisition and the signal will be an analog, small range, voltage, most like 0-5V. I have been doing some research on Analog Devices and they have everything in a chip. I was looking for a more module like board. The ability to change the parameters in case the analog input changes would be great. For example the range is just 0-1V.

Any help that anyone could possibly provide would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Lots of these systems will have the ADC in a chip. They are called SoC (System-on-chip) and you should be really using those to do your design. But if you want an ADC module outside of your chip, then you need to purchase a ADC IC and interface that to the inputs of your uC. Here you have some flexibility to choose the precision, whereas SoCs may put an upper limit on the precision.

Maybe others may be able to suggest boards.
 
Yeah. That is pretty much what I wanted to, but I wanted the signal conditioning outside of the chip.

So pretty much I want.

Sensor input > signal conditioning > ADC > micro-controller

Thanks for the input!
 
cdanderson04 said:
Yeah. That is pretty much what I wanted to, but I wanted the signal conditioning outside of the chip.

So pretty much I want.

Sensor input > signal conditioning > ADC > micro-controller

Thanks for the input!

Have you looked at the National Instruments line-up?

http://www.ni.com/dataacquisition/

They have lots of different form factors and interfaces for ADC boards and modules.

There's also Omega:

http://www.omega.com/das/

.
 
ranger said:
Lots of these systems will have the ADC in a chip. They are called SoC (System-on-chip) and you should be really using those to do your design. But if you want an ADC module outside of your chip, then you need to purchase a ADC IC and interface that to the inputs of your uC. Here you have some flexibility to choose the precision, whereas SoCs may put an upper limit on the precision.

Well, aside from offering more flexibility in selection, an external ADC allows some greater degree of immunity to noise from the microcontroller itself. Some microcontrollers can be put into a partial sleep state during conversion to minimize such noise, but an external converter could be put on a completely separate, well-filtered power supply, and could also perhaps be located closer to the signal source. It also gives you more room for future changes...it's easier to switch to a different ADC (or add another one) than it is to move to a different processor if it proves not to meet your needs.

If a really high quality ADC and analog section are what you want, you would probably be better off picking a uC you're familiar with or can more easily get tools for, and hooking it up to external components that suit your needs. If low cost/low complexity/compactness are higher priorities, a uC/DSP/SoC with an adequate on-chip ADC and analog front end is probably a better bet. It really depends on what you're trying to do...
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top