How can I convert unit vectors from cartesian to spherical polar coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beer-monster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
To convert unit vectors from Cartesian to spherical polar coordinates, one can use the relationship between the two systems. The unit vectors in spherical coordinates (\hat{r}, \hat{\theta}, \hat{\phi}) can be expressed in terms of Cartesian unit vectors (\hat{x}, \hat{y}, \hat{z}). To find the Cartesian representation of the y-direction unit vector, invert the transformation matrix that relates the two coordinate systems. Since the transformation matrix is orthogonal, its transpose serves as the inverse. This method allows for deriving the y-direction unit vector in spherical coordinates effectively.
Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know where I can find what the unit vector in the y-direction would be expressed in spherical polar co-ordinates (assuming that the polar axis is along z axis)?

I can find polar unit vectors expressed in cartesians and but not the other way round?

Anyone have a clue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try inverting the matrix. you have the unit vectors in spherical coordinates expressed in terms of cartesian, invert the solution and you'll have it.
 
I'm sure its on the internet somewhere. You can also do it yourself, here's how:

The change of basis from \hat{x},\, \hat{y},\, \hat{z} to \hat{r},\, \hat{\theta},\, \hat{\phi} is orthogonal. If you know the matrix that relates one to the other, you would normally invert that matrix to find the inverse relationship. Since the matrix in your case is orthogonal, the transpose is the inverse. So just look up what \hat{r},\, \hat{\theta},\, \hat{\phi} are in terms of \hat{x},\, \hat{y},\, \hat{z}, and then invert the matrix and the second row tells you \hat{y} in terms of \hat{r},\, \hat{\theta},\, \hat{\phi}.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top