Emitter follower question (transistors)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transistors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the input and output impedances of an emitter-follower circuit using a transistor with a specified beta and emitter resistor. For the unloaded output, the input impedance is suggested to be R_E multiplied by 100, based on the transistor's current gain. When connected to a source with a 500Ω output impedance, the input impedance is considered to be the sum of 500Ω and R_E multiplied by 100, while the output impedance is derived from this total divided by 100. With a 100Ω load at the output, the input impedance is calculated as 100 times the parallel combination of R_E and the load. The participant seeks confirmation on their calculations and understanding of the concepts involved.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


3. An emitter-follower is built using a transistor with β = 100 and R_E =
1000 Ω . (a) Whatʼs the input impedance with unloaded output? Now
suppose the input is connected to a source having output impedance
500 Ω . Whatʼs the output impedance of the circuit? (c) Remove the
source. Now, if a load 100 Ω is at the output, whatʼs the input
impedance?

Here, R_E/I_E refers to the output part of the transistor, and R_B/I_E refers to the input part.

(a)
β = I_C/I_B, so I_C = 100I_B.

So with unloaded output, should the input impedance be R_E*100?

(b)
If input is connected to a source with output impedance 500Ω, does that imply that the input impedance is 500+R_E*100? And that the output impedance is, thus, (500+R_E*100)/100?

(c)
100Ω output, so does that imply that the input impedance is 100(1000||100)? I believe that 1000||100 should be the total output impedance of R_E (since the load means that they're in parallel), and the input impedance is 100 times that, right?

Have I done things correctly? Am I missing anything?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_collector" has a nice summary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, I've already read it. I'm just not sure if I'm missing anything here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top