Enantiomer / Diastereomer Chemical and Physical Properties

AI Thread Summary
Enantiomers are generally said to have the same chemical and physical properties, but they can exhibit different biological effects due to their interactions with chiral molecules. This distinction led to confusion during an exam where a student marked a true/false question incorrectly, believing that enantiomers could differ in certain contexts. The professor acknowledged that while enantiomers are typically discussed in achiral environments, their interactions can vary, validating the student's reasoning. The discussion highlighted that enantiomers can indeed have different physical properties under specific conditions, such as in chiral environments. Ultimately, the student received an extra point for their insight after clarifying the matter with the professor.
[sammich]
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Alright so I know the common answer:
Enantiomers - same chemical and physical properties
Diastereomers - different chemical and physical properties

In lecture, our professor said that enantiomers can have different biological effects. I was confused because, as he had said earlier, they have the same chemical properties. I did some research into it and found that enantiomers react differently with chiral molecules. Therefore because there is an exception to the rule, by definition of chemical property, enantiomers do not always have the same chemical properties.

That was 3 weeks ago.

Today we had an exam, and unexpectedly, there were 2 T/F questions exactly as follows:

___ Enantiomers have the same chemical and physical properties

___ Diastereomers have the same chemical and physical properties

I didn't even think about it and marked FALSE for both. Now I'm sitting here kicking myself because I know my professor is going to mark the first question wrong. I'm trying to get all my facts straight so when I get the test back, I can explain my reasoning to him, and that his question did not specify if the enantiomers were in achiral environments.

My logic is as below: (Sorry, could only think of it using discrete math notation: upsidedown A means "for all", backwards E means "there exists")

2450fuw.jpg


If I wasn't rushing to finish the exam in time, I would've been more thorough and remembered that there was a discrepancy between the lecture and what I had found, and I would have asked him to clarify the question. He's a very educated guy, and very approachable, so I will be able to explain my reasoning. But... before I make a fool of myself, I just want to make sure that I am not mistaken

So... Am I misinterpreting something?

Thanks in advance!
[Oh, and I also read that enantiomers can have different smells and tastes... Are those not physical properties? Then why is our textbook, like many online sources, saying they have identical physical properties?]
EDIT: nevermind the smell/taste question, that just brings me back to the original question because smell and taste are interactions with our bodies, which contain chiral compounds
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You are essentially correct as the tragic story of Thalidomide illustrated. That statement of enantioners having the same chemical and physical properties ought to be qualified by "except in their interaction with other asymetric systems"

In addition to interactions with chiral biological systems, one way of illustrating the difference in physical properties is the results of a chiral gas chromatographic separation. With a second chiral molecule as the stationary phase, typically a cyclodextrin, the retention time of the two enantiomers is slightly different, enough to effect a separation. Ergo the physical interactions of the two enantiomers with the stationary phase are not equal.
 
And in a strong magnetic field with an electric field at right angles, you'd expect different diffusion rates, boiling points etc.
Your professor is propagating a myth, although a fairly useful one under normal circumstances.
 
Follow up:

Got the exam back friday, and as expected, the question was marked wrong. After he has us come pick up the exams, he hangs around the front of the room in case we have questions. I approached him, and he said that my answer was incorrect. I said, "I thought enantiomers react with chiral molecules differently, that's why they have the different biological effects."

He paused for a second, and responded, "That's something that's more in the Biological Chemistry department, for our class we're talking about achiral environments."

I asked, "But technically I am correct, right?"

He said yes.

After most of the students had left, I was walking out of the door and the professor was directly behind me. When we were outside, he says, "Bring your exam back on Monday, I'll go ahead and give you an extra point for that problem."


Thanks everyone for your responses! They are much appreciated :)
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top