How Do Energy and Momentum Conservation Apply to a Mass Sliding Down a Wedge?

captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
1.
A wedge mass M is at rest on horizontal frictionless table. Mass m is on wedge. There is no fricton between parrticle and wedge. Height of wedge = h and angle of incline= theta. The massm slides down wedge from rest and wedge slides left on table. How does linear momentum conservation apply?
The question also asks Hows does the energy conservation apply in this situation. Write down an equation expressing the consequence of energy conservation.(Hint the square of a velocity is equal to the sum of the squares of its components)

3. Can you just say that the horizontal components of the momentum must be constant before and after the mass m begins to slide? Therefore mvcos(theta) = Mu where u is the horizontal velocity of the wedge wrt the table and vcos(theta)is the horizontal component of the mass m wrt to the table?

Does the potential energy mgh = (Mu^2)/2 + (m(vcos(theat))^2)/2

Bit confused!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
captainjack2000 said:
Can you just say that the horizontal components of the momentum must be constant before and after the mass m begins to slide? Therefore mvcos(theta) = Mu where u is the horizontal velocity of the wedge wrt the table and vcos(theta)is the horizontal component of the mass m wrt to the table?
Looks ok to me.
captainjack2000 said:
Does the potential energy mgh = (Mu^2)/2 + (m(vcos(theat))^2)/2
Why are you only considering the horizontal velocity of the mass?
 
Should I be equating the vertical components to get

mgh = m(vsin(theta))^2/2

What about the kinetic energy of the wedge traveling horizontally?
 
Hootenanny said:
Looks ok to me.

Why are you only considering the horizontal velocity of the mass?

captainjack2000 said:
Should I be equating the vertical components to get

mgh = m(vsin(theta))^2/2

What about the kinetic energy of the wedge traveling horizontally?
You need to consider both the horizontal and vertical components of the mass and the wedge, remember that speed is a scalar quantity and direction doesn't matter.
 
So just to clarify:

You could say mgh = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)Mu^2 where v is the velocity of the mass m directed parallel to the slope?
 
captainjack2000 said:
So just to clarify:

You could say mgh = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)Mu^2 where v is the velocity of the mass m directed parallel to the slope?
Looks good to me :approve:
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top