Energy change under point transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the transformation of energy and generalized momenta under the coordinate transformation \( q = f(Q, t) \). It highlights the relationship between generalized momenta and the Lagrangian, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying partial derivatives while holding specific variables constant. A key point of contention is the mistake in equating partial derivatives, which leads to an incorrect expression for energy transformation. The correct transformation is identified as \( E' = E - p \partial q / \partial t \). Understanding the proper application of the triple product rule for partial derivatives is crucial for resolving the confusion.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
I will put it below.
Relevant Equations
.
How do the energy and generalized momenta change under the following coordinate
transformation $$q= f(Q,t)$$The generalized momenta: $$P = \partial L / \partial \dot Q = \partial L / \partial \dot q\times \partial \dot q / \partial \dot Q = p \partial \dot q / \partial \dot Q = p \partial q / \partial Q $$$$\dot Q = \partial Q / \partial q \times \dot q + \partial Q / \partial t$$$$E' = P\dot Q - L = p \partial q / \partial Q (\partial Q / \partial q \times \dot q + \partial Q / \partial t) - L = p\dot q + p \partial q / \partial t - L = E + p \partial q / \partial t$$But the answer is $$E' = E - p \partial q / \partial t$$What did i got wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When writing a partial derivative, it's important to keep in mind which variables are held constant. I often find it necessary to explicitly indicate the variable or variables that are held constant.

I think the mistake occurs where you essentially wrote $$\frac{\partial q}{\partial Q} \frac{\partial Q}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial q}{\partial t} $$

Convince yourself that the left side should be $$\frac{\partial q}{\partial Q}\bigg |_t \frac{\partial Q}{\partial t}\bigg|_q $$ You can simplify this using the triple product rule (also called the cyclic identity for partial derivatives).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top