maverick280857
- 1,774
- 5
Hi,
I'm trying to convince myself (mathematically) that energy is conserved at the vertex in e^-e^+ annihilation, while solving Exercise 3.5(b) of Halzen and Martin's book (page 83).
I am looking at the time dependent term in the scattering amplitude T_{fi} alone, to recover the delta function term which asserts the energy conservation. I know that I can look at the process in forward time or backward time, with the roles of the e+ and e- reversed.
Suppose the energies of the incoming electron and positron are E and E' respectively, whereas the energy of the outgoing photon is \omega (\hbar = 1).
From what I understand, the transition amplitude is proportional to
\int dt\,(e^{-i(-E')t})^{*}e^{-i\omega t}e^{-iEt} = 2\pi\delta(E+E'+\omega)
which gives the wrong answer of course, since the argument of the delta function should be E+E'-\omega.
I believe I am making a mistake in interpreting their "rule":
What does this mean? I'm a bit confused with the convention.
Thanks in advance.
I'm trying to convince myself (mathematically) that energy is conserved at the vertex in e^-e^+ annihilation, while solving Exercise 3.5(b) of Halzen and Martin's book (page 83).
I am looking at the time dependent term in the scattering amplitude T_{fi} alone, to recover the delta function term which asserts the energy conservation. I know that I can look at the process in forward time or backward time, with the roles of the e+ and e- reversed.
Suppose the energies of the incoming electron and positron are E and E' respectively, whereas the energy of the outgoing photon is \omega (\hbar = 1).
From what I understand, the transition amplitude is proportional to
\int dt\,(e^{-i(-E')t})^{*}e^{-i\omega t}e^{-iEt} = 2\pi\delta(E+E'+\omega)
which gives the wrong answer of course, since the argument of the delta function should be E+E'-\omega.
I believe I am making a mistake in interpreting their "rule":
The rule is to form the matrix element,
\int d^{4}x\,\phi^{*}_{outgoing}V\phi_{ingoing}
where ingoing and outgoing always refer to the arrows on the particle (electron) lines.
What does this mean? I'm a bit confused with the convention.
Thanks in advance.
Last edited: