Energy conservation in e-e+ annihilation

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I'm trying to convince myself (mathematically) that energy is conserved at the vertex in e^-e^+ annihilation, while solving Exercise 3.5(b) of Halzen and Martin's book (page 83).

I am looking at the time dependent term in the scattering amplitude T_{fi} alone, to recover the delta function term which asserts the energy conservation. I know that I can look at the process in forward time or backward time, with the roles of the e+ and e- reversed.

Suppose the energies of the incoming electron and positron are E and E' respectively, whereas the energy of the outgoing photon is \omega (\hbar = 1).

From what I understand, the transition amplitude is proportional to

\int dt\,(e^{-i(-E')t})^{*}e^{-i\omega t}e^{-iEt} = 2\pi\delta(E+E'+\omega)

which gives the wrong answer of course, since the argument of the delta function should be E+E'-\omega.

I believe I am making a mistake in interpreting their "rule":

The rule is to form the matrix element,

\int d^{4}x\,\phi^{*}_{outgoing}V\phi_{ingoing}

where ingoing and outgoing always refer to the arrows on the particle (electron) lines.

What does this mean? I'm a bit confused with the convention.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
The signs in your exponents are wrong. It should be
e^{i\omega}e^{-i (E+E')}, corresponding to E+E' in the initial state and omega in the final state.
 
clem said:
The signs in your exponents are wrong. It should be
e^{i\omega}e^{-i (E+E')}, corresponding to E+E' in the initial state and omega in the final state.

Thanks clem. I was earlier thinking that the photon contribution will be through the potential term which is sandwiched between the final and initial states, which (I thought) referred to particles alone.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top