Energy Conservation in Oscillatory Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a bullet embedding into a block attached to a spring, requiring calculations for the bullet's initial speed and the time for the system to come to rest. The initial approach using energy conservation was deemed incorrect, as it did not account for the energy transferred to internal energy during the collision. Instead, momentum conservation should be applied first to derive the initial velocity of the bullet in relation to the block's velocity post-collision. Once this velocity is established, it can be used to equate the initial kinetic energy of the bullet-block system to the potential energy stored in the spring. This method leads to the correct initial speed of 897 m/s for the bullet.
kaka2007
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A 2.25-g bullet embeds itself in a 1.50-kg block, which is attached to a spring of force constant 785 N/m. If the maximum compression of the spring is 5.88cm find (a) the initial speed of the bullet and (b) the tie for the bullet-block system to come to rest

I used:

E = K + U = .5(.00225)v^2 + 0

E=Umax = .5(785)(.0588)^2

and then solved for v but it's not right. btw the real answer is 897 m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The bullet was embedded in the block, which means that some of the kinetic energy of the bullet was transferred to internal energy of the system. Instead of using energy conservation, use momentum conservation. You know that for the spring to to compress a certain amount, the bullet-block system had a certain initial velocity (kinetic energy). Use that velocity for the conservation equation.
 
Use conservation of momentum first to get an expression for the velocity of the block with the bullet embedded in terms of the velocity of the bullet. The equate initial kinetic energy of the block+bullet to the spring energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top