Energy conservation in simple pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the application of energy conservation in a simple pendulum system, where the string does not perform work. The user is familiar with proving energy conservation without invoking forces, noting that potential energy is zero at the lowest point and kinetic energy is zero at the highest point. A participant explains that the law of mechanical energy conservation can be understood through the work-energy theorem, emphasizing that only conservative forces are acting on the pendulum. They suggest finding expressions for the work done by gravity and the change in kinetic energy to illustrate this relationship. The conversation highlights the connection between gravitational potential energy and the work done by gravity in the context of energy conservation.
imjudit
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! I've found this problem in my exercises book, and I'm having slight troubles solving it.
"Consider a simple pendulum with mass m, on a string with l length. Considering that the position of pendulum is determined with the angle \theta and noting that the string DOES NOT do any work, considering all the forces acting on the pendulum show that the energy conservation law is applied"

Well, I know how to prove that the ECL is applied without using the forces (considering that the Ep is 0 at the lowest point, and that the Ek is 0 at the highest).
Any ideas?

Thanks in advance

(I wasn't sure if this is supposed to go to "homework" section, since it isn't a homework...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The (so called) law of mechanical energy conservation is the work-energy theorem in disguise in the case when only conservative act on the system to which one may add non-conservative forces that do no work, as is the case here. The work energy theorem says$$\Delta K=W_{net}$$Just find expressions for the work done by gravity ##W_g## and the change in kinetic energy ##\Delta K##. Remember that the change in gravitational potential energy is the negative of the work done by gravity.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top