Energy Conservation: K0 + V0 = K1 + V1

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of energy conservation principles, specifically the equation U_initial = U_final. Participants clarify that K_0 and K_1 represent kinetic energy at different points, while V denotes potential energy, not velocity, addressing initial confusion over terminology. The final equation is confirmed as correct for solving related problems, and users encourage applying it with the appropriate values. There is an emphasis on understanding the distinction between kinetic and potential energy to avoid dimensional inconsistencies. Overall, the conversation focuses on correctly interpreting and applying energy conservation equations in physics.
nysnacc
Messages
184
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2016-9-22_21-33-59.png


Homework Equations


U_initial = U_final

The Attempt at a Solution


K_0 = 10 m/s
K_1 = 0 m/s (at peak)

V_0 = mgh_0
V_1 = mgh_1

1/2 mv02 + mgh0 = 1/2 mv12 + mgh1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nysnacc said:
V_0 = mgh_0
V_1 = mgh_1
I'm not sure what you mean here, velocity does not equal energy so those equations are dimensionally inconsistent.
Your final equation is correct and can be used to solve all three questions. Just plug in the appropriate values for each question.
 
billy_joule said:
I'm not sure what you mean here, velocity does not equal energy so those equations are dimensionally inconsistent.
I believe he is using V to denote potential energy, not velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes nysnacc and billy_joule
Orodruin said:
I believe he is using V to denote potential energy, not velocity.
Yes, potential energy, sorry for the misleading. I used the notation in my book.
 
nysnacc said:
Yes, potential energy, sorry for the misleading. I used the notation in my book.
So what is stopping you from applying the equation? What is it that you do not understand?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top