Energy Conservation or Momentum?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two packages colliding on a frictionless chute. For the inelastic collision scenario, the final speed of the combined packages is calculated to be 2.56 m/s, highlighting that momentum is conserved while kinetic energy is not. In the case of a perfectly elastic collision, the velocities after the collision are determined to be -2.56 m/s for the first package and 5.11 m/s for the second, confirming that both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between elastic and inelastic collisions in solving such problems. Overall, the analysis illustrates key principles of momentum and energy conservation in collision scenarios.
azn4life1990
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A package of mass m is released from rest at a warehouse loading dock and slides down a 3.0-h frictionless chute to a waiting truck. Unfortunately, the truck driver went on a break without having removed the previous package, of mass 2m, from the bottom of the chute.

a) suppose the packages stick together. what is their common speed after the collision?


b) suppose the collision between the packages is perfectly elastic. to what height does the package of mass m rebound?

p10-42alt.gif



Homework Equations


KE = PE
KE = 1/2 mv2
PE = mgh



The Attempt at a Solution


Vi = 0m/s

Ek = Ep

1/2mv2 = mgh
The masses cancel each other out, leaving me with

v = \sqrt{}2gh

v = 58.8m/s, this is the velocity at which the box 1 hits box 2

From this point i decided to use momentum to find the final velocity
(2m+m)vf = mvi

This simplifies to 3Vf = V/3 = 19.6m/s
Why would using momentum be flawed?

When I use KE is conserved throughout this system I get another answer... that is why one of the methods I'm using is wrong


1/2mv2 = 1/2mv2

1/2(2m+m)v2 = 1/2mv2

Doing some algebra I get that V2 = V2/3

For this answer the Vf = 33.95m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
azn4life1990 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Vi = 0m/s

Ek = Ep

1/2mv2 = mgh
The masses cancel each other out, leaving me with

v = \sqrt{}2gh

v = 58.8m/s, this is the velocity at which the box 1 hits box 2
You forgot the square root.
 
azn4life1990 said:
When I use KE is conserved throughout this system I get another answer... that is why one of the methods I'm using is wrong
Using conservation of kinetic energy for the first problem will give you a different answer than conservation of momentum. You can't use conservation of kinetic energy here because kinetic energy is not conserved. The collision is inelastic.
 
thanks for the input D H
so, for all collisions momentum is conserved.
for elastic collisions momentum + KE is conserved
for inelastic collisions momentum is conserved but KE isn't
so the square root of 58.8 = 7.668m/s
and the final velocity of boxes stuck together is 2.56m/s
 
Last edited:
Whoa! That doesn't conserve momentum.
 
sorry? i didnt understand what you meant by that
 
azn4life1990 said:
so, for all collisions momentum is conserved.
for elastic collisions momentum + KE is conserved
for inelastic collisions momentum is conserved but KE isn't
so the square root of 58.8 = 7.668m/s
and the final velocity of boxes stuck together is 2.56m/s
Looks good to me. Now solve part b).
 
alright for the next part we have perfect elastic collision

Ek = conserved
P = conserved

This is my first equation for Momentum:
m1v1+m2v2 = m1vf1+m2vf2

This is my 2nd equation for kinetic energy
1/2m1v12 + 1/2m2v22 = 1/2m1vf12+1/2m2vf22

This should take some algebra :sLooking into my textbook I found these simplified equations

Vf1 = Vi*(m1-m2/m1+m2)
For this part I found that the Vf of the first object = -2.56m/s

Vf2 = Vi*(2m1/m1+m2)
For this part I found that the Vf of the object = 5.11m/s
 
Last edited:
It checks out - momentum conserved, energy conserved.
Also did it without the simplified equations and got the same answers.
 
Back
Top