Energy conservation problem (need closure)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum release height (h) for a mass sliding on a looped track to remain in contact at all times. The correct calculation shows that h equals 2.5r, derived from energy conservation principles. Participants clarify the normal forces at different points of the loop, with correct expressions for the forces at the top and bottom of the loop being discussed. The importance of using energy conservation to find velocity is emphasized, leading to the conclusion that the normal force calculations are validated. Overall, the problem is resolved with the correct application of physics principles.
qswdefrg
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the small mass m sliding without friction along the looped track is to remain on the track at all times, even at the very top of the loop of radius r.
a) calculate, in terms of the given quantities, the min. release height h.

if actual release height is 2h, calculate
b) normal force exerted by track at bottom of loop
c) normal force exerted by track at top of loop
d) normal force exerted by track after block exits loop onto flat section

Homework Equations



Ek = 0.5mv^2
Eg = mgh
Fc = mv^2/r


The Attempt at a Solution



a) total energy = mgh
mass must remain on track at top of loop, so

mgh = 0.5mv^2 + mg(2r)
h = 2.5r

b) Does the release height matter? Because if mass does not accelerate up nor down, then Fn =mg? Is this the same for d)?

c) Centripetal force keeps mass moving
Fn = mv^2/r - mg
Fn = m(v^2/r - mg)

I'm not sure if this is right either.

any pointers/hints would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tiny-tim said:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

the mass will maintain contact with the track only if the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=73" is non-zero

find that reaction force by using Ftotal = ma, with a being the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=27"

start again! :smile:


at the top of the loop

Fnet = FN - Fg = ma

FN = mv2/r + mg

FN = m(v2/r + g)

this is similar to the answer I had before. I realize now that I hadn't used the 2h at all. Am I supposed to use energy conservation to figure this out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

yes, use conservation of energy to find what v is

(but your equation is wrong … a is in the same direction as g … anyway, how else would you get FN = 0?)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

yes, use conservation of energy to find what v is

(but your equation is wrong … a is in the same direction as g … anyway, how else would you get FN = 0?)

I got v2= g(2h-r)

So is the equation is Fn+Fg=ma?

Sub in velocity and I get Fn=2mg[(h/r)-1]. Is this correct?
 
Never mind my previous post; I think I've got it now.

at the top:

v2= 4g(r-h)

Fnet=Fc=Fn+Fg
Fn=mv2/r - mg
sub in v2
Fn= {[4mg(r-h)]/r } - mg

at the bottom:

v2= 4gh

Fnet=Fc=Fn-Fg
Fn=mv2/r + mg
Fn= (4mgh/r) + mg

at the end:

Fn= mg

:confused: *fingers crossed*
 
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

(b) and (c) look fine :smile:

(though you haven't finally converted h into 2.5r, and it would be easier to check if you put all the stages in)

but shouldn't this be 4g(h-r) ? :wink:
qswdefrg said:
v2= 4g(r-h)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi qswdefrg! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

(b) and (c) look fine :smile:

(though you haven't finally converted h into 2.5r, and it would be easier to check if you put all the stages in)

but shouldn't this be 4g(h-r) ? :wink:


Yes the h and r should be switched; silly error my bad.

finding h in part a):

mgh = 0.5mv2 + mg2r
at the top min. speed is sqrt rg
mgh = 0.5mrg + mg2r
simplify
h = 2.5r

thanks so much for your help. i (finally!) got it.
 
Back
Top