Energy Conversion: KWH/M2, MWH/CM2 & WATT/M2

AI Thread Summary
KWH/M2 and MWH/CM2 are related but differ by factors of ten due to their units, with 1 MWH/CM2 equating to 10,000,000 KWH/M2. In contrast, WATT/M2 does not include time as a factor, making it distinct from the other two units. The conversion between these units requires careful attention to the metric prefixes, such as milli (m) and mega (M). Misunderstandings often arise from confusion over these abbreviations and their corresponding values. Accurate conversions are essential for proper energy calculations in various applications.
Smile_Face
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Dose kwh/m2 and mwh/cm2 and watt/m2 equal? if not what are the relationship between them?

How can convert between them??

Thanks in advance
Smile_Face :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kwh/m2 and mwh/cm2 are equivalent - they differ by some power of 10. In the numerator k=1000, m=1000000. In the denominator m = 100cm.

watt/m2 is different in that the other two have time as a factor and this doesn't.
 
Thanks for replying :)

1 mwh/cm2 = 0.1 kwh/m2 is that right??
 
Smile_Face said:
Thanks for replying :)

1 mwh/cm2 = 0.1 kwh/m2 is that right??
incorrect. You are off by a factor of one hundred million.

1 megawatt hour = 1,000,000 watt hours
1 kilowatt hour = 1,000 watt hours

1 meter = 100 centimeters

So

1 megawatt hour per square centimeter = 1000 kilowatt hours per square centimeter.
since there are 100 centimeters in a meter there are 10,000 square centimeters in a square meter.

So 1000 kilowatt hours per square centimeter = 1,000 x 10,000 kilowatt hours per square meter = 10,000,000 kilowatt hours per square meter.

I spelled everything out because I think you were confused by the abbreviations. You lost sight of what the units actually are.
 
Be careful with upper/lowercase in prefixes:
m = milli = 1E-3; M = Mega = 1E6
p = pico = 1E-12; P = Peta = 1E15
(and there´s deci and deka, of course)
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top