Energy Fluctuations in Canonical Ensemble

chiaki
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In deriving <E2>-<E>2

starting from <E>=U=sum(Eiexp(-beta Ei))/sum(exp(-beta Ei). the taking derivative of U with respect to beta, the book always notes E (thus Volume) is held constant. what i am trying to do is taking the derivative of U with respect to beta or T (temp) and V (volume). but i get stuck

Homework Equations



<E>=U= sum(Ei*exp(-beta*Ei)/sum(exp(-beta*Ei)
dU=dU/dT+dU/dV

The Attempt at a Solution



I applied the above equation dU to U as listed above. i performed the quotient and product rule obtaining terms partial derivative with respect to V and T. I tried to look for a way to combine terms and cancel terms. but I cannot. anyone help thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you taking the derivative of U with respect to V? It only asked you to take the derivative with respect to beta.
 
in the notes in the book its hold Ei constant, i want to perform the derivative more generally allowing Ei to vary
 
But I am pretty sure, they take a partial derivative with respect to beta. So you don't worry about N or V.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top