Energy for Orbits: 500km Above Earth's Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Orbits
AI Thread Summary
To send a 1000kg object to a height of 500km above Earth's surface, approximately 4.5 billion Joules of energy is required just for lifting. However, to place the object into orbit at that height, additional energy is needed to achieve the necessary orbital velocity, which is significantly greater than the energy required for lifting alone. The discussion emphasizes that mechanical energy in orbit consists of both kinetic and potential energy, necessitating a calculation of their changes. The correct approach involves equating gravitational force with centripetal force to derive the orbital velocity. Understanding these energy requirements is crucial for accurately determining the energy needed for both lifting and orbital insertion.
ice
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This question came up on a quiz and i got it wrong.
a)how much energy does it take to send a 1000kg object from the surface of the Earth to a height of 500km above the Earth's surface? b) how much energy does it take to put the same object into ORBIT at 500km above the surface of the earth.

For part A, i got -4.5*10^9 Joules, but i don't know if that's right.
part b is what i really don't understand, so any help here would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part A you simply calcuated the amount of work required to lift an object to a certain height. If you simply lifted it to that height and let it go it would simply fall back to Earth. In part B, the keyword is ORBIT which means that in addition to merely lifting the object you must impart to it sufficient velocity for it to remain at that height in order for it to ORBIT the Earth. You will find that the kinetic energy requirement of orbiting is substantially greater than the requirement for simply lifting the object.
 
but isn't Ek=1/2 Ep for all orbits? i tried using v^2 = sqrt(2GM/r), which didnt really work out.
 
I think for b) it is:

<br /> ME = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \frac{mMG}{r}<br />


<br /> ME = \frac{mMG}{2r} - \frac{mMG}{r}<br />

The Mechanical Energy = Kinetic Energy + Potential Energy
I substituted the orbital velocity for v which equals to:

<br /> v_{orb} = \sqrt{\frac{MG}{r}}<br />

You can derive this by putting the Gravitational Force to be equal to the centripetal force.

If there are any errors - feel free to comment.
 
The part that you're leaving out is that the payload starts off on the surface of the Earth with whatever potential energy it has there and (in the simplified case) NO kinetic energy. What you need to calculate is the CHANGE in both the payload's potential energy and kinetic energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top