Energy in damped harmonic motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy equation for a damped harmonic oscillator, expressed as E = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)kx^2. The author questions the derivation of the rate of energy dissipation, dE/dt, which is stated to equal -cv^2, where c represents the damping coefficient. They clarify that the differential equation of motion, ma + kx = -cv, is derived from Newton's second law, incorporating both spring and damping forces. The confusion arises from connecting the energy dissipation with the damping force. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the relationship between energy dissipation and the damping force in the context of damped harmonic motion.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
Hey PF,
my book either got sloppy in a derivation or I am not connecting two very obvious dots.
It gives the energy of the damped harmonic oscillator as
E = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)kx^2
then takes the derivative with respect to time to get dE/dt.

then it gives the differential equation of motion as
ma + kx = -cv

okay cool I'm following so far...
then it says with this equation of motion we know that
dE/dt = -cv^2

what am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ff= -cv is the damping (friction) force.
dE/dt is the rate of dissipation of the mechanical energy.
Or the power dissipated due to the action of the friction force.
 
PsychonautQQ said:
Hey PF,
my book either got sloppy in a derivation or I am not connecting two very obvious dots.
It gives the energy of the damped harmonic oscillator as
E = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)kx^2
then takes the derivative with respect to time to get dE/dt.
Which your text should have as ##\dot E = v(ma + kx)##.

then it gives the differential equation of motion as
ma + kx = -cv
That's just a rearrangement of Newton's second law, with the external forces being the spring, linearly directed against displacement, and drag, linearly directed against motion. Mathematically, ##F=ma = -kx - cv##. Adding ##kx## to both sides yields ##ma+kx=-cv##. Substituting that result back into the expression for the time derivative of energy yields ##\dot E = -cv^2##.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top