Energy in two different frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lawrencel2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Frames
Lawrencel2
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
If you have a particle, and you know its rest mass is about 100 Mev/c^2 and in the lab frame you measure it to travel at (8/9)^1/2 c then what is its energy in the rest frame?? Would it be just 100MeV? or 300 MeV due to the relativistic constant? i don't really know how you would reason out the difference in frames? can anyone explain this idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the particle's own rest frame, it's stationary, so its kinetic energy is zero. Therefore, in that frame, its energy is only the rest energy which is 100 MeV.
 
jtbell said:
In the particle's own rest frame, it's stationary, so its kinetic energy is zero. Therefore, in that frame, its energy is only the rest energy which is 100 MeV.

Keep in mind the so-called kinetic energy "of" a particle is really an energy associated with a collision between energetic particles. Acceleration with respect to a light source, causing a Doppler shift of the light being received, does NOT in anyway mean that the light energy is different relative to the motions of the observer, but rather, the energy measured once the light is received is of the collision between the photon and the observer. The same is true for particle (which in this case is not light). The additional "kinetic energy" supposedly either gained (or lost) by this particle by change of reference frame actually owes physical existence by the work done on the observer in the direction either toward (or away from) that particle, which is what will contribute additional energy to (or reduce the energy of) the collision.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top