Energy-momentum tensor for the Dirac spinor

teddd
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I'm having a problem calculating the energy momentum tensor for the dirac spinor \psi (x) =\left(\begin{align}\psi_{L1}\\ \psi_{L2}\\\psi_{R1}\\ \psi_{R2}\end{align}\right)(free theory).

So, with the dirac lagrangian \mathcal{L}=i\bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu\psi-m\bar{\psi}\psiin hand i should be able to figure out the energy momentum tensor by using the formulaT^\mu{}_\nu=\frac{\delta\mathcal{L}}{\delta \partial u_A}\partial_\nu u_A-\delta^\mu_\nu\mathcal{L}
and since we're assuming the equations of motion to be true we can forget of the latter term in the above equation, and focus on the former.

Here come the probelms.
First of all, I'm not sure on which values does the A index in the T^\mu{}_\nu forumula run: are they 1L, 2L, 1R, 2R?

If so, how can you tell me explicitly how to do the functional derivation \frac{\delta\mathcal{L}}{\delta\partial u_A}?

By writing explicitly the lagrangian (forgetting about the mass term) i get to
\mathcal{L}=i(\psi^*_{L1},\psi^*_{L2},\psi^*_{1R}, \psi^*_{2R})\gamma^0\partial_0\left(\begin{align} \psi_{L1}\\ \psi_{L2}\\ \psi_{R1}\\ \psi_{R2}\end{align}\right) +i(\psi^*_{L1},\psi^*_{L2},\psi^*_{1R},\psi^*_{2R})\gamma^1\partial_1\left(\begin{align}\psi_{L1}\\ \psi_{L2}\\\psi_{R1}\\ \psi_{R2}\end{align}\right)+i(\psi^*_{L1},\psi^*_{L2}, \psi^*_{1R},\psi^*_{2R})\gamma^2\partial_2\left (\begin{align}\psi_{L1}\\\psi_{L2}\\\psi_{R1}\\ \psi_{R2}\end{align}\right)+ i(\psi^*_{L1},\psi^*_{L2},\psi^*_{1R},\psi^*_{2R})\gamma^3\partial_3\left( \begin{align}\psi_{L1}\\\psi_{L2}\\\psi_{R1}\\ \psi_{R2}\end{align}\right)and I stop here becaouse those gamma matrices makes the calculation ridiculously complicated, which bring me nowhere.

Can you folks help me??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to vary each component of the 4-spinor separately, but you do need to independently vary both ψ and ψ, because these are the two values of uA. So you'd better first integrate by parts and write the Lagrangian in its symmetrized form: ½ψγμ(∂μψ) - ½(∂μψμψ + mψψ.

Taking the functional derivative δL/δ∂μψ is easy, because L is linear in ∂μψ.
 
You don't need to vary each component of the 4-spinor separately, but you do need to independently vary both ψ and ψ, because these are the two values of uA

That was my first guess.

But can you explain me the following issue then?

The spin angular momentum S^{\mu\lambda\kappa} is defined to be S^{\mu\lambda\kappa}=-i\frac{\delta\mathcal{L}}{\delta\partial_\mu u_A}(S^{\lambda\kappa})_{AB}u_Bwhere S^{\lambda\kappa}=\frac{i}{4}[\gamma^\lambda ,\gamma^\kappa].

Now here S^{\lambda\kappa}=\frac{i}{4}[\gamma^\lambda ,\gamma^\kappa] is a 4x4 matrix that acts on the 4 components of \psi (x) =\left(\begin{align}\psi_{L1}\\ \psi_{L2}\\\psi_{R1}\\ \psi_{R2}\end{align}\right), so I'm pushed to say that those A,B indicies on the (S^{\lambda\kappa})_{AB} actually run over the 4 values (1L 2L 1R 2R), and so do the ones of the u_A

Where am i mistaking?
Thanks for your time!
 
By the way, since the question has actually changed should I open a new post??
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top