Energy Needed To Go A Given Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sothh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Speed
AI Thread Summary
To determine the energy required to accelerate a mass to a given speed, the kinetic energy formula changes based on the speed relative to the speed of light. For low speeds, the equation is KE = ½mv², while for speeds approaching light speed, it becomes mc²/√(1 - v²/c²). The additional energy needed to reach speed v is calculated as mc²(1/√(1 - v²/c²) - 1). For example, accelerating a 20-kilogram mass to 0.1c requires approximately 9e+12 kilojoules. Understanding these equations is crucial for calculations involving relativistic speeds.
Sothh
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hey, I don't have much of a physics background.

I have been searching for an equation that shows how much energy is needed to make a given mass go a given speed.

For example, let's say I want to send 1 gram at half light speed. How much energy is required?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you want to calculate the kinetic energy of the mass.

For low speeds (compared to the speed of light) the kinetic energy is KE = ½mv². But for fast speeds, it's a bit more complicated:
76cc95f8c7e7d0edde43428308072182.png


(I can't seem to get Latex to work.)
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Sothh! Welcome to PF! :smile:

For a speed of v metres per second, the energy of a mass of m kilograms is mc2/√(1 - v2/c2) joules.

If v = 0 (the mass is at rest), that energy is obviously just mc2, which is therefore called the rest-mass.

So the extra energy needed to get it to speed v (the kinetic energy) is mc2(1/√(1 - v2/c2) - 1) joules. :wink:

If v/c is very small, then that extra (kinetic) energy is approximately mc2(v2/2c2), ie mv2/2.
 
Thanks!

Just to confirm I am using this correctly, it should take 20 kilograms around 9e+12 kilojoules to go .1c, correct?
 
Sothh said:
Just to confirm I am using this correctly, it should take 20 kilograms around 9e+12 kilojoules to go .1c, correct?
Sounds about right.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top