Energy Needed to Maintain Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riceman1974
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Velocity
AI Thread Summary
To maintain a constant speed in a vacuum, no additional energy is required due to Newton's first law of motion. The calculations for accelerating an object to a specific speed, such as the Enterprise reaching 0.5 light speed, involve significant energy, approximately 2.25*10^24 joules for a 200,000 metric ton mass. However, it's important to consider that as speed increases, relativistic effects cause the effective mass to increase, which affects energy calculations. The method of calculating energy can also be simplified using kinetic energy formulas like 1/2 mv^2. Overall, once a constant speed is achieved in space, no further energy input is necessary to maintain that speed.
Riceman1974
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I know how to figure out how much energy is needed to acclerate to a certain speed. What I don't know is how much energy is needed to maintain that speed.

For example. I was watching the first Trek movie the other day, and Kirk orders the Enterprise to go to .5 light speed. So the Enterperise goes from 0 to 150M meters per second in like 5 seconds. I wondered how much force would be needed to do that, so I calculated:

F = M * A
The ship has a mass of 200,000 metric tons, so 200,000,000 kg * acceleration, which going from 0 to .5 light in 5 seconds would be 30,000,000 meters per second per second (i hope that's right).

That gave me 6*10^15 Newtons (damn!)

I then tried to see what this would be in joules, so I next calculated the distance traveled, using:

Distance = .5*Acceleration*Time^2
.5*30,000,000*(5^2)

That gave me 375,000,000 meters.

To then calculate joules, I used W(joules) = Force * Distance
6*10^15 * 375,000,000

That gave me 2.25*10^24 joules of energy needed to accelerate a 200,000 metric ton object to .5 light speed in 5 seconds (please correct me if I'm wrong).

My question, how many joules per second is needed to maintain that speed?

This is not homework. I'm just a nerd.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0 Joules/sec are necessary, if you are traveling in a vacuum(space) see Newtons first law. Also, the energy required to get up the speed is a little more than you calculated because when you increase your speed, your mass increases as well, see special relativity / einstein. But, your method of calculations are right if you ignore special relativity ( I didnt actually do your calculations). You don't need to calculate the energy from force times d, you can use 1/2 m v^2 too. (would have been quicker, but same answer.)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top